Should we start using “The appropriate role in the appropriate place at the right time” or “NEW” instead of “The right person in the right place at the right time.?” by Thomas B. Holman?
-------------
The saying “the right person in the right place at the right time.” is considered the biggest deception in all scientific, humanitarian, and religious fields worldwide.
I suggest replacing it with “the appropriate role in the appropriate place at the right time.” not only for the person but also for legal parties, such as organizations, countries, political parties, writers, researchers, high positions, innovators, politicians, famous people, thinkers, philosophers, clerics, and professional roles.
Consider this saying and its application against all divine and artificial laws. How?
And why?
An application of God’s law on earth, one of the essential roles of man (human rights) in life is to apply what God has revealed to His prophets and messengers of laws and rulings that are applicable in every time and place, and among his tasks is also to ensure their application and care by establishing borders, spreading virtues, and commanding Virtue and forbidding evil.
The laws (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) contributed to establishing awareness of human freedom and his right to a free and dignified life, and liberating him from all restrictions, as these laws of one source made man the orbit of the universe and the source of honor in his human capacity.
That is why the roles you play or represent are significant. Forget your personality anywhere: in your home. In faiths and all fields, roles are part of the system.
Unfortunately, most human beings have mastered evil roles in various ways through their actions, and we will show those roles and their performers through tradition, history, science, and knowledge.
Good roles are not well-known by most people. We will do our best to draw them and clarify their application from the sources of heavenly sciences and doctrines and the reasons for our failure to know them, not for criticism but for treatment and return to good roles and away from devilish and evil roles.
.
We will reveal the evil roles and show how to perform the good roles with examples and evidence, and we will allow you to participate in many discussions, dialogues, and live broadcasts, God willing.
Next Questions?
[1]
Why “the appropriate role in the appropriate place at the right time.”?
[2]
How to apply the “NEW” saying per each concept?
[3]
Suggestion: Looking forward to generating a group on LinkedIn and Platforms on many social media. What do you think?
Intriguing. Cultures and aspects of diversity make me think about this question. I, personally, would not change this saying into role because it removes the identification of personhood from the statement. The right person, at the right place at the right time, for me being a healthcare provider indicate the individual role of a person involved in a patient rescue. Language wise, removing right person, from the statement practically removes the person from the comment, thus making the statement less human. (Possibly filled with a robot in the future!) Just my thoughts.
Steven Davis: I think you misunderstand the question.
First: The question has nothing to do with any Actor or Legal Party records in healthcare or taxation, among others.
Second: All Actors and Legal Parties are not robots; they are the center of everything in society. We are talking about the role anyone or any legal party plays only in some of their lives.
Third: When anyone gets evaluated or assessed should be based on the role anyone plays rather than on his personality, which is problematic.
Example: if anyone is acting the role (Father) and doing it well or poorly. We end up with two roles: Good Father and Bad Father, and the result will be completely different.