Classification in many research fields seems to abound. Your precious comments will enrich the general view on this issue. Is it an issue depending on the research field?
Certainly yes. the reason is that a conference paper not only involves all aspects of preparing a paper , but it also requires an oral presentation before a body of scholars.
the following link may be more useful in getting the subject insight
http://marksanderson.org/publications/my_papers/JASIST2015c.pdf
http://www.ierek.com/news/index.php/2018/05/23/difference-conference-paper-journal-paper/
Certainly yes. the reason is that a conference paper not only involves all aspects of preparing a paper , but it also requires an oral presentation before a body of scholars.
Definitky not in the country like India, where the standard of screenibg the confrence abstracts is poor.
I think the conference paper should have the same strength as for the journal papers
In the United States, peer-reviews professional conference papers pass a competitive process with high tejection rates, at least in my field, public health. These conference papers are not given nearly as much weight as the journal articles but they do count when assessing a researcher‘s contribution to the body of research in their field.
YES, it should be taken into account some sort of scientific activity. Certainly should be recognised as a kind of reserarch activity.
Why not, it should be taken into account for field classification.
Sure YES, it is backbone of our academic activities.
Good luck,
Emad
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Papers