All of them but its utility to the common man should get maximum prominence

A scientific article is best judged by its scientific merit in terms of content, genuinity, applicability and ease in understanding the message. The publishing journal is somewhat important as a reputed, quality journal can generally recognises quality articles. But honestly, the author's name has very little or nothing to do in this regard.

All great scientific articles have been appreciated and regarded even though they might have unduly been unattended or unaddressed for many days. Time has ultimately made its own corrections in recognising genuine qualities. This is historically true.

Check Subben's checklist:

Article “Subben׳s checklist” and the assessment of articles in mathe...

and the folllow-up:

Article Time out of mind: “Subben’s checklist” revisited – A partial...

You will probably be able to learn a lot from these. If you have any questions, just e-mail me ([email protected]).

All of them, after publishing also the IF of the journal and number of citations.

Remember that also the form of data presentation and its discussion is important.

regards,

G