The question you raised is actually a bit ambiguous. We have many types of land cover, just based on one index, it is unlikely possible to characterize the full spectrum of land cover. However, we do have some preferred indices, or rather, thematic indicators, extracted from the remote sensing images, for our research, for example, NDVI, EVI, SAVI, SARVI, GDVI for dryland, LAI, WDRVI, Tasseled Cap Greenness, etc., for vegetation cover, NDII, NDWI and Tasseled Cap Wetness for moisture, Tasseled Cap Brightness, the 1st Principal Component and albedo for evaluating the bareness or brightness of soil. Thus, it is up to you to decide to choose in terms of your research target. Usually instead of using a single index, we can select several ones for achieving the objective. We may also integrate some biophysical indicators such as elevation, slope, land surface temperature, and phenological features to complete the research.
Wish this can help you sort out your ideas and procedure for your research.
The question you raised is actually a bit ambiguous. We have many types of land cover, just based on one index, it is unlikely possible to characterize the full spectrum of land cover. However, we do have some preferred indices, or rather, thematic indicators, extracted from the remote sensing images, for our research, for example, NDVI, EVI, SAVI, SARVI, GDVI for dryland, LAI, WDRVI, Tasseled Cap Greenness, etc., for vegetation cover, NDII, NDWI and Tasseled Cap Wetness for moisture, Tasseled Cap Brightness, the 1st Principal Component and albedo for evaluating the bareness or brightness of soil. Thus, it is up to you to decide to choose in terms of your research target. Usually instead of using a single index, we can select several ones for achieving the objective. We may also integrate some biophysical indicators such as elevation, slope, land surface temperature, and phenological features to complete the research.
Wish this can help you sort out your ideas and procedure for your research.