My research group and I are conducting a systematic prevalence review, and we are having difficulty understanding the tools for assessing the risk of bias.
Which would be more suitable to fulfill this role - ROBINS-I or ROBINS-E?
The choice of ROBINS E vs I depends on whether you're looking at observational studies of exposures or interventions. Here's a couple articles.
Robin's E
Article The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBI...
Robin's I
https://www.bmj.com/content/355/bmj.i4919
Make sure you consider limitations using it, such as being able to determine whether confounders bias outcomes, let me know if you have specific questions.