i am finding that drug court officers abiding by SAMSHA best practices protocol set up decades ago, have not been educated in interpreting results (they arent medical students) They look for the positive but dont know what other information on the lab report means.
i have reviewed two reports which i believe i could be great questions on a test . 1) the first one is positive for alcohol and pot, everything looks normal, the client swears they are clean. The interpreter missed the significance of the abnormal ph level of 10 in the urine, I understand that to be an indication that the sample has been contaminated. Am i right?
(no one can pee a 10, you are screaming at 7.5 to 8 because it is burning.
2) the second scenario involves a client who swears she is clean but got a positive for alcohol. the sample was taken dec 22 before christmas, was flown to San Diego, where it sat for 6 days until it was processed. the woman has candida for a decade. the candida feasted off of the sugars in the urine, metabolizing it to alcohol for 6 days.
she faces jail time for this misintepretation of the results. This is an expired specimen in my opinion regardless of refrigeration. Am i right?