Both methods are of equal value but it would just depend on the type of study you are conducting. Reflective methodology does not necessarily have to be confined to a research setting, as it can be used in any setting to promote continuous learning. It is basically about learning from past experiences by reflecting on the actual experience/s.

Thematic analysis is more about obtaining a deep analytical understanding of data collected. This entails reading the data, coding, analysis, using techniques (wordclouds, tree maps, cluster analysis etc) to determine relevance and commonalities, formulation of themes and subthemes etc. This can be done using Software Programs such as NVIVO and others. This can also be inductive or deductive in nature.

However, you can also try a hybrid approach of ‘Reflexive Thematic analysis.’ In this case, you will use the thematic approach and base it on the data gathered through experiences of relevant people/respondents. Goodluck

Here in Brazil we use Thematic Analysis and Content Analysis to reflect on themes and responses in qualitative research. We have as authors: Gil, Bardin, among others.

I am not aware of any specific approach known as "reflective methodology" -- can you give us a citation for that?

In contrast, Braun and Clarke (2022) now label their preferred version of Thematic Analysis as Reflexive Thematic Analysis. I have to say, however, that I did find anything that was explicitly "reflexive" in their description of this method. Instead, there was just the generic advice to be self-aware throughout the analysis process.

I agree with David L Morgan to a certain extent. 'Reflective methodology' is rare or only used in a specific context. Rashika Shukla, it would be helpful if you could provide a reference for this notion.