While anybody writes an issue for discussion. Everybody should take account and read all the valuable opinions of every researcher.
Actually, do we read?
Thanks
If you do not read it in full, you do not have information about what the author has said and about the arguments put forward by those who criticize this work.
It can not be argued without theoretical or practical bases, much less with logical arguments or solid scientific evidence.
In my point of view, I do read them, every single one of them. Sometimes, I appreciate them and elarn a thing or two, sometimes I do recommend them. Other discussions and questions are followed until I am prepared to join the discussion. It is a healthy way of exchanging ideas academically and professionally at some point so it is vital to read.
If you do not read it in full, you do not have information about what the author has said and about the arguments put forward by those who criticize this work.
It can not be argued without theoretical or practical bases, much less with logical arguments or solid scientific evidence.
Thanks for your reply José Luis García Vigil Moaid K Hussain Sir
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Psychology
- Attitude