Because judgement is always based on a particular measurement and everyone would have different measurement. Sensation + measurement = judgement.

Thank you Muhamad Taufik Hidayat for you reply.

I think, Dear Muhamed, that Sensation is "weakly" relevant to what is necessary to give a Judgement , indirectly perhaps. Measurement, itself, needs some prerequisites: the referential, adequate weights, rules, ...

The Perception of what we are judging is a part of this Judgement. To avoid giving a distorted and biased Judgement we have to "well" perceive the subject; to know it.

If I ask you:

To give a "good", "rationale" and "objective" Judgement we need Knowledge (with a "big" capital K) about the subject.

Sincerely, Djamel.

Sorry Muhamad, I have to add that:

It is useful every where and every time in life: If you don't know, don't judge!

Regards

Great statement Mr. Djamel Zeghida

However, many people do judgement to an object based on their "little" understanding or knowing on the object. Unavailability or lack of "knowing" sometimes trigger a judgement.

You are right, Dear Muhamad, unfortunately, it is a common behavior which we must avoid.

Regards.

Dear Djamel Zeghida

The statement "The judgement of anything is a part of its perception" is typically incorrect (maybe always) WHEN you consider any scientific outlook on perception OR what "perception" is typically considered. I guess perception may well be related to past "judgement" -- that depends on how broadly you use the word "judgement" (but I think you would have to go over-"broad"). I cannot imagine how that perspective would be useful (or seem to be congruent with phenomenology) to say that "The judgement of anything is a part of its perception" -- thus I would be careful to agree with that statement to any extent. Perhaps you should ask: how would one see phenomenon that way and is that "way" something you can do or something a scientist would do?

Thank you for your contribution Dear Brad Jesness ;

By your reply you give a Judgement on this Statement, You Do?

" is typically incorrect (maybe always) "

It is to be respected, we have no problem with this!, whatever our position to accept or reject your opinion. Fear enough?

Now this Judgement was based on a well known and understanding of the given Statement, one can say that your Judgement was "Well founded", "Good", "Rationale" and "Objective", otherwise it will be qualified to be "Not Well founded", "Not Good", "Not Rationale" and "Not Objective", Distorted and Biased Judgement ! Clear enough?

The Statement means that:

• The Perception of what we are judging is a part of this Judgement;
• To give a "good", "rationale" and "objective" Judgement we need Knowledge (with a "big" capital K) about the subject to be Judge;
• If you don't know, don't judge!

Is it Wrong to be respected?!!!

Regards, Djamel.

Dear Djamel Zeghida

I apologize for perhaps seeming disrespectful; I know I am sometimes quite harsh in the effort to be frank (frankness which often seems necessary in responding to things that are concepts or views/approaches in Psychology) -- and it is all about ideas/statements and not about people (or a person).

In this case, it appears I did not read the title of your post the way you meant. I read the title of your post a common/likely way one would read it: [for part of the response to a situation:] judgement --> perception; this was my reading of it WHEN it rather appears you meant to say: perception is part of judgement (in part, perception --> judgement (which for the most part I do not even disagree with)). For the record: I believe the way I read your title would be the much more common way to read it, but with your recent response here you make it clear you meant: (quoting): " The Perception of what we are judging is a part of this Judgement ". In any case, please accept my apology. [( The following may be relevant, and in part yielding the need for my apology: I am fortunate enough to have to know just one language, and I do know only one language. Others are not so "fortunate", which may yield non-standard expressions in English. )]

About my judging: To take appropriate responsibility in this world: certain topics and concepts one feels quite or very knowledgeable of (BUT no capital "K"), one must feel free to express an opinion on, which not infrequently involves some judging. But, again, since I did not interpret what you said as what you actually meant: I do apologize (and perhaps I should apologize anyway for being so often harsh).

P.S. I believe it is likely that any individual (at most) can realize just some small "sliver" of Reality (capital "R") and basically (and in-effect) just momentarily. Thus, your standard for one to rightly judge is too high (or there would be no "judging" at all).

Hi Dear Brad

I apologize to be late to give feedback,

Brad,

You do not have to apologize at all, I did not feel at all any thing of what you are apologize about, kind from you!

What happened can be kind of practical proof that this statement is true and more to be a Tautology. :-)

Best Regards, Djamel.