Historically, the subject question has been met mainly with "After The Fact" assertions.
Yet when one learns of the infrastructure failures . . .bridges, tunnels, pipelines, highways. . .
it seems clear that early audits of those projects would have cured, if not mitigated the unacceptable results. Such results include but are not limited to loss of life.
To the knowledge of this writer it seems there is not a system of practice management for compliance with a Professional Engineer's Code of Ethics.
Please enlighten this writer, and our colleagues.
Q. Why, Who, What, and How might this need be satisfied with evidence?
Related to your query there are some attractive highlights here : https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2020-02/828145%20Code%20of%20Ethics%202020%20D.pdf
https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/ethics-resources/board-ethical-review-cases/appropriate-notification-and-review
https://www.pdhuniversity.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Ethics-for-Engineers-NSPE-Code.pdf
Thank you Muhammad for your thoughtful support.
Please "Stay Tuned" as I struggle to achieve both definition and clarity.
Stay Healthy!
Cheers,
Bill
The current trend of ever-increasing recourse to quality policies, which is also reflected in an increase in work prescription, has led to a relaxation of control operations. The latter are considered to be not very effective, but above all they have a cost that society often does not want to assume.
In various prospective studies, we have highlighted the consequences that this can have on the creativity of workers and on the false sense of security that these procedures inspire. We give some examples of this in these works :
Book Modes and methods of production in France in 2040
Article Comment les techs transforment le travail et pourquoi l’accé...
(French version)Article How techs are transforming work and why the current accelera...
(English translation)- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Philosophy
- Ethics