There is a form of philosophy by some that a mechanism needed is to have population control by using net worth as a basis for retention, and to remove those of lower net worth.

I believe population control is murder, but if we did seek a population control, I suggest that the highest net worth should be first in line to become the departed.

They accumulated when they could have shared, they profited at other's expense, and their mindset is not humanitarian, but egocentric.

Yes, if we need population control, then once you accumulate over 100x the average net worth of a global human being, you should be removed to make room for others.

Debate me, please, if you feel that your DNA pool is superior to others and your arrogance allows you the ability to speak such nonesense publicly.