Dear Saman Abdulqadir Hussein Dizayi Aside from the fact that technology pervades all walks of our contemporary life, poetry still continues enjoying the position it has acquired from time immemorial. Its validity and aesthetic aspects cannot be overestimated and overlooked on the evidence that technology and poetry are closely associated, especially in the field of digitization of humanities in general and literature in particular. On this, the English poet B.B. Shelley once said " Poetry is a mirror which makes beautiful that which is distorted.”
Dear Hasan Mohammed Saleh I agree with your opinion but in reality we feel the decline of poetry interest by the generatiin Z unfortunately. It not only makes distorted beautiful but gives meaning to our existence. Thabk you for your interest in the discussion.
Despite the advancement in technology and people's engagement with electronic poetry can not be removed from human existence. Poetry as we all know is the expression of one's feeling either of pain, joy, regrets. With the happening of today there is a lot to be written so poetry come to play. Poetry is something that can not be erased from the world
OMG! I rather see a lot of poetry on line for example in these short videos on YouTube, Facebook etc). I have a Facebook account in which I share my poems with my friends. That wouldn't have been possible pre-social media. ... given the high publishing fees. I think social media has somewhat changed the character of poetry; conflating it with popular culture, creating more avenues for publishing and performance. If I remember well, a poet won Spain Got Talent recently.
Didymus Douanla@ actually you are right when it comes to publishing at social media, but in my opinion great poetry such as The Waste Land or Leaves of Grass disappeared. Regards
I agree with you Saman Dizayi, we always look back at the auld lang syne ...human nature eh?. come to think of it, technology or no techno, it seems no contemporaries can ever write like Homer, Defoe, Shakespeare, Wordsworth etc.
But on the other hand, if you go to the poetry foundation website, for example, you can read, listen and respond to such contemporary poets as Poet laureate Carol Ann Duffy.
The Question could be, does poetry occupy the same place as it was before? and the answer is , of course not... simply because of the various and many great means of expression that swarm the modern world. That is the reason why people feel the decline of poetry
In the USA at least, poetry slams have done a lot to keep poetry vital as an oral tradition. Print is not the whole story by any means. Another example: Ken Nordine, who just died at age 98, put out sound recordings of "word jazz" accompanied by jazz musicians, which was highly popular and compelling. Check out his Wikipedia (English language) entry.
Then the means and ways of expressing poetry changed, social media and digitalization affect the style, techniques and themes. May be the time of the appearence of great poets like Eliot, Baudlaire.... etc. vanished. May be there will be great poets with fond readers but actually it could be something completely different with what we used to.
Certainly the oral slam poetry/rap trend can be more communal, as with the oral traditions of many cultures ancient and modern, Reading poetry in books is great, but it is solitary and contemplative rather than dynamic. I do not say one is better than the other at all -- but poetry is certainly alive. The oral is more interactive and thwarts establishing a literary canon and is not great for those like me who like to be ablie to write essays about writers. :) Video of slams however could bring criticism back into the mix.
Those who are concerned with the delivery of poetry, rather than 'reading poetry in books' might be interested to know that W.B. Yeats tried an experiment to return poetry to the oral tradition,with his friend the actress Florence Farr, who 'chaunted' poems to an instrument made by Arnold Dolmetsch. This experiment continued for some time and has been admirably discussed by Ron Schuchard in Yeats Annual 2.
This method was an attempt to restore poetry to an oral culture to those who listened collectively 'friend by friend, lover by lover', undivided by book culture.
Later on Yeats tried to recreate this oral tradition on the radio, ('Poet's Pub')a dire catastrophe in his recollection. He was not a particularly good reader of his own, but composed poetry by humming to himself, 'buzzing like a bumble bee' according to a friend.
Of course, poetics will always occupy an important place in culture, especially in times of social upheaval, because it can articulate trends, hopes, desires and destructions on an aesthetic level.
In order to avoid becoming redundant, poetry must focus more and more on its own mechanics of production and articulation so that one line of a poem is equal to, or more than, pages of prose.
I think that the advent of personal electronic devices has made it easier for short literary texts to circulate among the masses, as modern human beings have less and less time to devote to reading. So, although the novel seems to have lost its original popularity, I thing poetry stands a better chance for its brevity.
The other, more important issue, however, is that now there are just too many people claiming to be poets (or refusing the label while they try to write supposedly poetic texts) but the product is far beneath the level of insight and innovation that we would expect from strong literature. And I believe it is mostly because they generally don't know what constitutes good art. After all, if you try to discuss that with them, they'll accuse you of being backward, narrow-minded or oppressive just because they can't define aesthetic principles for what they do. People should realize that art isn't just arbitrary, it's like any other craft, not everybody can produce art.
I am not quite sure that digitalization has had a tremendous effect on poetry. Poetry has of course gone online and the kind of small press which used to promote poetry has now been taken up by ejournals and ezines, etc. I would say this has only helped in the dissemination of poetry. It is indisputable that we live by language. So long as we tend to think of poetry as that particular space in which language is put to its best possible use in the most innovative of ways, poetry will survive. In fact, it will remain one of the domains unaffected by robotic reproductions, keeping it distinctly human.
Very well said, @Vadim. Poetry has a specificity, the smell of the soil so to speak, making it virtually untranslatable. In spite of this, you will find poetry indeed gets translated and quite readably so. How else an Indian like me can enjoy and appreciate Mayakovsky and Akhmatova? Perhaps you may say I appreciate them for all the wrong reasons, but I'd think my poetic experience is incomplete without reading them, even if it is in translation.
@Wolfgang Indeed, one of the frequently-quoted remarks of Wordsworth, which has received quite a few hard knocks from Eliot, but a harmless truism now. Poetry is presumed to be much more than feelings now, giving it a hard-edged intellectuality. Its spontaneity has also become a questionable virtue.
Pound made that famous haiku new, for sure, since it does not follow the classical 5-7-5 form-- though the second of the two lines does have 7 syllables.
Here are 4 haiku of mine that adhere to the classical form:
Before it descends
the dusk’s wind lifts a red leaf –
black when the sun sets.
Some young March spiders
creep from the drooping foliage
among their elders.
Dead Lincoln's pension:
two wintry coins over eyes
which have borne interest.
Epitaphs chiseled
in tombstones toppled by age
catch rain for spring birds.
My counter maxim for a poem's creation would be "Make it work." Make the words evoke thoughts, images, epiphanies AND reflection. There many methods to make a poem work. Vikram Seth wrote a novel in verse, The Golden Gate, in iambic pentameter, which is one of the best works of poetry AND narrative of all time.
Thank you @Dr Schwarz for reminding me those memorable lines of Pound which I believe can be found in his essay "A Retrospect," a compendium of do's and don't's to aspiring poets. "Emotional and intellectual complex" has its echoes in Eliot's own essay on the metaphysical poets in which he credits Donne with the ability to fuse thought and sensation. And to go back to the query raised by @Dr Saman, poetry is the only vehicle which offers a synthesis of this kind making it very relevant to contemporary times which insists on keeping them apart.I think the individual is made whole by poetry.
@Dr Vadim Gorshkov Thank you for your valuable insights into translation and translators who can make or mar the reputation of an author. We live in times when translators no longer accept their passive and slavish relationship to the source text but insist on their visibility. I read Mayakovsky rendered in English by a Russian translator when Soviet Russia flooded friendly countries like India with their tranlated texts of Tolstoy, Gogol, Dostoevsky, Gorky and Mayakovsky in affordable editions when books by Penguin and Random could be pricey. I forgot the name of the translator.
Dr. Dizayi, I do not agree that the time of great poets is gone. I am not a fan of retrospective canonization of the earlier poets, although I love their works. I think there are and always will be great poets, but also that "expectation" is not congruent with the self-regenerating essence of the poetic impulse. Originality and universal vitality is an indestructible and ineradicable impulse of imagination and spirit. Poems or indeed any literary creations must be read intensely as if no other work ever existed. Sometimes by doing this we get a speck of gold, sometimes a mother-lode IMO. Respectfully, Jim.
Poetry has a nature beauty of words describing the nature with it poetic significance covering also our universal with all the glamour consisting of the humanity . It is in this line poetic cannot be mixed up with any other areas with has a significance part of the man ,material & finance .
Poetry both lures Alice in Wonderland's white rabbit down the rabbit hole and follows the rabbit down. There are so many rabbit holes into other worlds. In poetry everything, even the most mundane things, are surreal.
That we still consider poetry to be justified and to offer it a spacious place in the lives of today's people is one thing; but that poetry has lost its past position as the narcosis or hope of humankind in this material world and can be replaced day by day with technology and material culture, is another topic. On the one hand, most people who have answered this question have nothing against poetry. On the other hand, they may not read as many poems as academic articles and essays (apart from whether they write their own or not!). The present world, with its increasing materialism and enjoyment of it, seeks to humiliate, reduce, and offer a worthless place to the role of poetry in the life of humanity, rather, to eliminate it.
But I still believe in the continued existence of poetry, it grows like a beautiful flower, sometimes slower, sometimes faster, and one day the future generations will either admire the poetic emptiness of this age and draw their consequences from it by reporting it and analyzing this tastelessness!
There is still much to discuss poetry's position in a technology-driven world! Technology has not affected the reading itself, because thanks to the Internet and smartphones, tablets, etc., many people can now read online and everywhere (on the go), only the way of reading is different, especially because one no longer or very rarely reads poetic books/poetry, but rather news, weather forecasting, and in the best case specialist texts. After all, there is still this absolute minority of poems (the poetry lovers!) And it will continue to exist, hopefully!
"The task of the poet, in a world full of loud lies, to say what is irreducibly true in a level voice.'' Zbigniew Herbert, one of the greatest Polish poets.
Rap and slam poetry qualify in our culture and have been immensely popular, though perhaps disdained by established Poetry venues. Jim Morrison regarded himself as a poet. Homer played the lyre to the Iliad, they say. Poetry will never die, but audiences will vary greatly in size and receptivity. I do not see a wide general audience for the late John Ashbery, not as much so as for Billy Collins or Langston Hughes. That's show biz. :)