Thank you for your answer, but I don't think so because this fossil has large vertical costulations while Ostrea has remarkable growth lines perpendicular to the hook.
The short answer: I don't know. The pictures are fuzzy and not sufficient to decide, and the lack of depositional and paleoenvironmental information does not help.
A slightly more helpful answer: it might be a solitary scleractinian theca partly crushed and fragmented, so the septa near the top of the theca are not in their original radial orientation and therefore not easily identifiable. It might even be a fragmentary reworked rudist from Mesozoic layers. Even less likely since I see no sutures on the external surface, it might be a crushed barnacle capitulum. Without seeing pictures from the sides that might show a commissure line (or its absence), I would not exclude a fragmentary oyster, either. And the list of possibilities is not even complete.
I cheked the microfauna, I determinated the Maastrichtian planktonic foraminifera such as G. Gansserina and Globotruncana species, so I think that this fossil is a rudist bivalve.