While you are supporting results of your research by an argument/reason provided by another research paper after restructuring it and providing the reference as well does not amount to plagiarism conditionally verbatim should not be there.

You could support your results with citations from other sources but you will still need to make an original contribution based on your experimental results.

If so, there is no plagiarism.

While you are supporting results of your research by an argument/reason provided by another research paper after restructuring it and providing the reference as well does not amount to plagiarism conditionally verbatim should not be there.

Plagiarism is not only when you copied words for words from another author or your previous work it also called plagiarism when you copied someone's idea even after reframing the statement without referencing to the original author. The later only save you from 'similarity' problem but still under plagiarism. However, when you quote a sentence or reframe the sentence with reference to the originator then you should be free and for originality of your work the similarity must be to the minimal as most journals accept just bellow 19% similarity. Best of luck.

I concur with Dr Kumar. The hypothesis and the validity of the result could be inspired and attested by previously works. Doing so is the true meaning of the word r e s e a r c h ie further studies on past works.

Informative