Experiments outside the standard model offer hints for addressing key questions behind stuff that is not visible to telescopes. Physics scientists also need hints on what causes the neutrinos' tiny mass and the relative absence of antimatter, as compared to normal matter in the universe. This shifting gives them an idea of a new type of light-carrying particle that would exist within a new stage of the whole universe. Such particles are often referred to as dark photons. Such particles would help different things in the universe to have effects on each other. The dark matter could pave the way based on a new kind of extremely tiny particle called axions, which could also aid physics scientists in solving the strong CP puzzle.
Interesting in this group of unpublished particles is the existence of a supersymmetric (SUSY) boson. The Higgs boson contained in the 1960s, R. Brout and F. Englert—now deceased, the British-based Peter Higgs, Francois Englert, and Gerald Guralnik all at. For instance, SUSY says that all known particles, such as the top quark and electron, have heavier relatives known as superpartners. Nico van Leeuwen, an ATLAS physicist, former ATLAS Collaboration Spokesperson Burri, and Dr. Harry Cliff contribute to the article 'What have the 'little superpartners' done to help us? I'm grateful (2020) authored by Anton is currently researching string theory. SUSY accounts for ultraviolet behavior and unification of three fundamental forces when it comes to high-energy particle standard models. Nothing in what has been observed in the real world today ties all the necessary bindings SUSY demands, even if axial bosons and other fine-tuned ideas need discovery to get traction. With its beautiful but untrue history, SUSY truly believes all the super partners live in the energy levels when physicists extract new ideas for what the universe might be made of. The hypothetical SUSY bosons help answer a few unanswered questions and anomalies in the standard model theory.
Scientists have wondered about individual gradations or flavors that particles in flavor physics denote. The standard model particle physics depicts the laws governing elementary particles' abilities, which indicate how these particles look or feel. The rights and masses of flavors like the up and down quarks that get combined into nucleons, which include protons and neutrons, are designated by the fine pinpricks of the particles in this flavor physics. The manufacturer's protocol for neutrinos also appears to be treated with a certain difference in particle behavior. Particle physics wherein the strange quark joins the nucleon party got coined as strange during the initial exploration of flavor physics. Flavor control ensures that particle interactions such as proton decay, which explain why our protons haven't grown inclination to be an antielectron particle or else neutrons dropping equivalence for a proton, come to pass at every fictional border of physics. For any given interaction to occur, flavone states, particle professor and author Joe Lykken note particles quite possible pass to a mass state. Although a weirdest puzzle on the official standard model particles is only observable when comparing neutrinos and quarks, strange behavior in ions has also been seen in compounds made of appeal, charm, and other different types. Therefore, flavor in particle physics is essentially a property particle derived from flavone and with no requisite to be conserved in particle interactions like any additional particle condition. These can be stable or change depending on the type and variety of the organization of the interactions.
“Particle Physics: What new particles or forces might be revealed by experiments beyond the Standard Model?”
- really fundamentally is beyond “…. “dark photons”… “supersymmetric (SUSY) boson” , all other “little superpartners'”…”, etc.;
- really there is no any necessity in any “unification of three fundamental forces when it comes to high-energy particle standard models.” - [besides real “unification” – see below];
The dark matter fundamentally by no means “could pave the way based on a new kind of extremely tiny particle called axions, which could also aid physics scientists in solving the strong CP puzzle” [why? – see https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388922029_The_informational_physical_model_detection_of_dark_matter_particles]
All in the italicabove really by no means are “new ideas for what the universe might be made of” - since all these ideas are fundamentally nothing else than some transcendent by no means scientifically rational – and by no means having any real experimental grounds - mental constructions that have so no relation to the objective reality.
That exists in mainstream physics completely logically inevitably because of that in the mainstream philosophy and sciences, including physics, all really fundamental phenomena/notions, first of all in this case “Matter”– and so everything in Matter, i.e. “particles”, “fundamental Nature forces” – and so “fields”, etc., “Consciousness”, “Space”, “Time”, “Energy”, “Information”, are fundamentally completely transcendent/uncertain/irrational - while really they all can be scientifically defined only together,
- and so in every case when the mainstream addresses to any really fundamental problem, the result completely inevitably is transcendent/mystic something; that in italic, etc., are typical examples.
The fundamental phenomena/notions above can be, and are, really scientifically defined only in framework of the Shevchenko-Tokarevsky’s really philosophical 2007 “The Information as Absolute” conception, recent version of the basic paper see
- and more concretely in the Shevchenko-Tokarevsky’s Planck scale informational physical model, which is based on the conception, two main papersare https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391209088_The_Informational_Conception_and_Basic_Physics, and
At that really already experimentally observed rather numerous particles zoo and corresponding measured particles and interactions parameters data are well enough for real development of the theory that really could scientifically describe and analyze what exists and happens in Matter, what really is possible only on the next after QM scale - the Planck scale, and basing on the SS&VT model above, where, including, initial Planck scale models of particles and fundamental Nature Gravity, Electric, and Nuclear/Strong forces are developed.
Including at least these 3 Forces are fundamentally really “unified” in that all act by the same scheme - however all these Forces are functionally fundamentally different when make Matter to be as it is, and so there is no any other rational “unification” besides the above,
- while really all Forces are also already really unified in the both, classical and QM, mechanicses by including in concrete cases corresponding potential energies, momentums, etc., in classical and QM Lagrangians equations.