Yes, for the high quantum numbers the quantum solution is supposed to look like the classical solution. Also in a limit of large particle masses.

Dear Juan Weisz

But in this limit we found a sequence of peaks separated by a distance equal λ/2 that λ is de Broglie wavelength: λ= h/mv and v is the classical velocity, so if the correspondence principle of Bohr describes exactly the reality we should deduce that in fact, the motion does not continue!

What do you think?

With best regards.

I think you are on the right track, yes in the classical limit you do not see the

fine detail in the density, just the average. A particle in a box just have standing waves that do not move.

So can we found a model of motion that supports quantum mechanics and classical mechanics?

The relation between CM and QM is mechanical aspect of it. just very brief. CM unit is atom, while QM unit is the fraction of an atom.

Very large unknown number of constituent elementary particle is making one unit of an atom. An atom is very organized unit of universe. It is not a mechanical as we think, it is intelligent element of universe. Why ?

Because few of them is making your DNA and mine. This is a description of QM.

Classical Physics: the framework of classical physics. By the late nineteenth century the laws of physics were founded on Mechanics, Electricity and Magnetism, and based on large collection of matter. The classic mechanical physics demonstrates difficulties from the beginning for the portrayal of building block of the Universe.

These tow are day and night.

https://www.academia.edu/38373675/Creation_of_a_Quantum_Mechanic_Universe_and_its_Rotation.doc

Dear Javad Fardaei

You said:"These tow are day and night."

Yes, QM describes the very tiny objects and CM describes the macro object, but as we know we have one concept the "Earth's rotation" that can explain both day and night.

So the concept of the quantum jump can explain the QM and CM,

and I give some mathematical formula for that (but without the classical limit),

and I give the main aspects of the universal law of motion...

With best regards.

Dear Thierry De Mees

You said:"These are the basics of quantum angular momentum. Very interesting, I think!"

Yes, it is very interesting and very complicated too, but my point is that we can propose a new model of motion that generalizes the concept of "Quantum Jump", therefore we can deduce the principles of quantum mechanics so that the oddity of the quantum puzzles becomes easier to understand and interpret.

With best regards.

Dear Thierry De Mees

Yes, but I mean by "quantum jump":

The motion is a sequence of appearances and disappearances events, the continuous trajectory of the particle cannot exist.

With best regards.

The Feymann model gives you the path uncertainty, any path is possible, but all are weighed.

Dear Juan Weisz

You said:" The Feymann model gives you the path uncertainty, any path is possible, but all are weighed. "

I think in fact there is no path at all because, in my opinion, the motion is a sequence of appearances and disappearances events, the continuous trajectory of the particle cannot exist.

The reality is only for ε that is the duration during which a particle exists before disappearing and the μ that is the duration of the particle's disappearance from our world before it reappears later.

What we called velocity or path is from our point of view only!

Sure the space-time reflects its aspects on ε and μ, but the velocity and path are like some suitable parameters that we used to deal with space-time.

With best regards.

What is particle?

is it a chemical ?

it is very confusing, I don't think a particle can spin, or ability to spin.

Javad

Just use normal imagry. A particle is like a marble, perhaps smaller.

Spin can be visualized as rotation about an axis.

A marble is able to spin.

Again, urge you to read basic stuff.

Mazen

Your remark is also confusing, what would cause appearance and dissapearance.? Or you think mathematically, creation and destruction operators?

I think perhaps the Feymann model is more in line with waves, that have constructive interference only along the Classical path.

Dear Javad Fardaei

You said: "I don't think a particle can spin, or ability to spin. "

I think also that the spin happened by disappearance and appearance in the same place...

No continuity in anything in Physics, the continuity is an illusion...

With best regards.

Dear Juan Weisz

You said:

"Your remark is also confusing, what would cause appearance and disappearance.? Or you think mathematically, creation and destruction operators?"

I don't know the cause of appearance and disappearance (perhaps this is a metaphysical subject), I only explain how the motion occurred!

No continuity exists in anything in Physics, the continuity is an illusion...

I don't think we can use the usual operators of creation and annihilation because I deal here with a specific particle and the annihilation and creation must happen in exact locations.

With best regards.

The wave carries continuity.

Dear Juan Weisz

You said:" The wave carries continuity. "

Yes, but this is just an approximation, I think when we go deeper we need to suppose that space and time are quantized (like Loop quantum gravity theory), so in this level, the wave can't carry continuity anymore.

With best regards.

It depends on the scale at which you examine things. At Planck length and time , it is indeep presuposed that space and time are very jumpy. At more normal scales you use the wave function, probability density.

Dear Juan Weisz

You said:" It depends on the scale at which you examine things "

Yes, but the reality is one! and it is the deeper one, therefore the continuity is suitable for scale >> plank length, but this is just an approximation, then the reality lies in the discontinuity.

With best regards.

Mazen Khoder and Juan Weisz The universe is made of two kinds of matter, chemical matter (all the element of periodic table) and non-chemical element (particle). An atom is smallest, complete, and very well organized entity of the universe. Anything that is not atom is called particle, particles are much smaller than an atom, they do not have motivation to move, they do not spin by their nature.

As you should know, all the element of periodic table is result of interaction of hydrogen creation. i.e. two hydrogen is making one helium. this has been accepted by all the scientists. Hydrogen is ancestor of all the element of PT. Every time when two atoms wants to make heavier atom, they have residue by their interaction, that residue is Particle.

Einstein did not like quantum Mechanics, unfortunately his theory is a mechanical and it is not working with our 100 billions of galaxies universe, while universe building block is QM phenomenon.

Dear Javad Fardaei

You said:

"particles are much smaller than an atom, they do not have motivation to move, they do not spin by their nature."

I think the reality is the opposite! because the atom is made from particles, so the motion of particles leads to the apparent motion of atom, so the reality is what did the particles, therefore the motion of the atom is a consequence.

With best regards.