While a new theory with its Memories' capacities/natures/capabilities, _AND_ WITH realist innate guidance aspects coming into behavior patterns throughout ontogeny, may well be easiest to find and show true with species-typical expressions of cognitive developments and abilities: this does not mean these same factors and the same progressions and the same essential [(essential for the theory)] progressive behavior patterns (structures and functions) VIA appropriately developed (consolidated and integrated) Memories could not set-up and thus allow-for the SAME innate-guidance factors: FOR their emergence _AND_ that being the KEY EMERGENCE OF what's [also] needed (in/for new behavior patterns) _AS_ NEEDED * : ALL VERY LIKELY may potentially be found in the same sensible, discovered and defined SEQUENCES for explaining the behavior patterns of prodigies (as that of normal people; and, thus that which is true for all members of the species in a distinct demonstrable, fully empirical and scientific way).
Only ONE THEORY of human cognitive development does this: ETHOGRAM THEORY. Thus the rest of them, all of them, however hypothetical in/with their constructs (of processes and the some-how development of stable, central points of knowledge and skills) AND even allowing that they OFTEN have both no direct evidence and NO direct empirical grounding (I.E., are without clear foundation EVER, none at all [
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biology