the main differences we can see is that Western Philosophy focuses on more logic than that in china...

Hegel argued that Chinese has not developed philosophy in a strict sense based on Greek Philosophy or Western's perspectives. In the ancient time, Chinese did not have a systematic view on "nature", "truth" & "logic". It will be interesting to redefine the meaning of Philosophy by including ancient Chinese Philosophy.

Mainly, Hegel didn’t know human being have fuzzy thinking way, particular in ancient oriental world. Typically, in modern time or recent history, western philosophy approximately domains all the areas. So, What’s reasonable or unreasonable, is always judged by Western thinking way.

In my view, philosophy is the love of knowledge and knowledge is universal regardless of boundaries. There are Greek philosophy, Western philosophy, Eastern philosophy, Chinese philosophy etc. and all are the accumulation of wisdom from the past great thinkers.

Here is a link to an interesting article:

Is There Such a Thing as Chinese Philosophy? Arguments of an Implicit Debate

Author(s): Carine Defoort

Source: Philosophy East and West, Vol. 51, No. 3, Eighth East-West Philosophers' Conference

(Jul., 2001), pp. 393-413

Published by: University of Hawai'i Press

Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1399849

Abstract

The question of whether or not there is such a thing as "Chinese philosophy" is seldom explicitly raised, but the implicit answers to this question--although different in China and the West--dominate institutional and academic decisions. This article not only constructs a typology to recognize, differentiate, and evaluate various answers to this question, but it also takes the sensitivity of this matter seriously by comparing it with one's attachment to something as sensitive, arbitrary, and meaningless as a family name.