I would like to confirm the soundness of a simple steady-state energy balance over a solar cell.

Assume we take a solar cell as the control volume for an energy balance where the electrical conversion efficiency is defined with respect to the incident solar power.

As shown in the attached energy balance and energy flow diagrams, are the following general equations correct for steady-state operation:

  • P_inc = P_ref + P_ele + P_conv + P_cond + P_rad
  • P_inc = P_abs + P_ref
  • P_abs = P_ele + P_th
  • Where:

  • P_inc is the incident solar power on the solar cell's surface.
  • P_abs is the solar power absorbed by the solar cell.
  • P_ref is the solar power reflected from the solar cell's surface.
  • P_ele is the solar power converted to electrical power.
  • P_th is the solar power converted to thermal power.
  • P_conv is power convected to the ambient.
  • P_cond is power conducted to the substrate.
  • P_rad is power radiated to the surroundings.
  • alpha: is the absorptivity of the solar cell.
  • eta: is the electrical conversion efficiency.
  • My uncertainty is rising from the fact that P_ele is defined with respect to P_inc not P_abs and how that would affect the energy balance.

    Also, what is the energy form of P_abs? Clearly, P_abs is an intermediate step in the conversion of solar power into electrical and thermal powers. Does that mean P_abs is in the form of internal chemical power within the semiconductor?

    Any help is highly appreciated.

    More Omar Z. Sharaf's questions See All
    Similar questions and discussions