I recently posted an observation on this question on Why most research use Wrought Alloys when Researching Cast Al-MMC's? Most of papers I see coming to IJMC on Al-MMC's are using wrought as host metal. The common ones are: 6061, 6063, 7045, 7075, and 2000 series. These are very difficult to cast, which is why most of the researchers use very simple shapes just to get test coupons. They also usually conduct only limited mechanical tests and focus on wear testing, which is of limited value to design engineers. These are mostly academic studies and they tend to cite each other's works. I understand trying to limit compositional interactions, but this approach doesn't develop alloys that can be used into useful commercial shapes. The early Al-MMC's were based upon A356 (Al-Si) and also Al-Si-Cu (like 319 and 383) as a means to improve stiffness (modulus) and high temperature properties. There were collaborative efforts to see what material was needed to solve problems and see if it worked.

Prof. Rohatgi gave an AFS Golden Anniversary Lecture in 2019 that was published in the IJMC:

Ajay Kumar, P., Rohatgi, P. & Weiss, D. 50 Years of Foundry-Produced Metal Matrix Composites and Future Opportunities. Inter Metalcast 14, 291–317 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-019-00375-4

See the online version: https://rdcu.be/cB8IH

Unfortunately, this trend of using wrought alloys as the base metal is why a significant number get Transferred to other more materials orientated journals or Open Access. Very few look at can the MMC's developed be cast into complex shapes and can the material be re-processed. This is a BIG PROBLEM!!!! Our universities and researchers must address this issue, if we want to advance the use of materials that can see practical applications. Don't just seek Solutions in Search of a Problem.

More Thomas Prucha's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions