considering the total energy flow in nature ... how much earth population can contribute in its changing

Natural processes are cyclic , interconnected and interdependent. Moreover, all together they are a system of systems and a balanced system, Within certain buffer limits, inputs and outputs of the system is reasonably balanced

In my opinion, nature is changing and what a pity, we are causing/affecting the change of the nature in negative way.

The attitude of the human being greatly affecting environment . Repetitive use of plastic , global warming due to excessive air pollution , heavy metal toxicity with

water pollution hammers our environmental balance . Istly we are polluting

our environment day after day . As a result the atmospheric physico-chemical parameters change day after day . Now nature is not our eco friendly and change

in nature is occurring automatically . This automatic attack in environment

is PHONI , TSUNAMI etc.

For Nature, change is a normal thing !! These natural changes can affect food webs. But, for mankind to try to change Nature, either intentionally or in error, is destructive.

change is a normal

Respected Researchers please do not copy paste others answers on the same thread.

Dear Nazia Asad I cannot get your point, can you make it clear..so that we can follow you accurately

Change is not a choice it is the law of the universe.It is normal human functioning to achieve the best form of potential.We are always looking forward to find better ways of doing things, better ways of learning, better ways of running a business, better ways of negotiating, better ways of solving social ,emotional ,political and economic problems.We are either in a state of changing or planning to change in a systematic manner.

Either is true. Nature can have a lot of changes over time. They can be negative such as floods, hurricanes and global warming. Positive changes are also happening to nature constantly. Man can contribute in a lot of positive changes to the environment or negative changes that have destructive effects on the environment.

Please, I want to keep it anonymous, please read the answers and you will find, who has copied whom, and I think you have read all the answers.....

Dear Hassan Izzeddin Sarsak

Nour Shakir

Dear Nazia Asad I got you point and also agree with you

Both

Well,

The term of climatic changes is an accurate description of all the influences on the Earth's atmosphere, including the impact of human activities, and things that have not been scientifically determined related to astronomical effects, for example

Earth movements:

1 - revolves around its axis (between the poles) at 1660 km / h from west to east (cycle per day).

2 - Vibration movement and a conical shape to be completed by 25800 years.

3 - Movement around the sun at 30 km / h and its rotation at 365.26 days. The axis of the earth is not vertical but at an angle of 23° 5.

4 - movement of the solar system towards the star Vega at 20 km / sec.

5 - the movement of the Milky Galaxy around itself and an independent movement away from other galaxies.

Sincerely

Thanks Bayan Hussien Alaa Saad Alattabi Luciano da F. Costa :)

Change is nature and its happens in cycles. Diurnal cycle, lunar cycle, solar cycle, etc. Change is not the problem, the main problem is exposure.

some cycles are small and we are used to them. some cycles are very long in comparison with our individual life time or life time of few overlapping generations. so, there is a lack of exposure and experience.

In the evening we not worried that it is getting dark, after low time we are not worried that high tide is coming, after winter we are not worried that summer is coming. The main reason is we know what is coming next is nature, we cannot stop it, it will come and go back, and most importantly we are prepared

Change is easy to perceive because we can observe it most of the time or otherwise notice it through certain parameters like for instance the way we measure time. The concept of change is different for different people. It must be prominent to the level that one considers it to be significant and that level is again different for different issues and also varies from person to person.

Yes we are changing, but it is hard to say if it is good or bad change. And it is also difficult to discuss it here thoroughly. In short I would like to say that in terms of learning, technology, and understanding we have improved, but to attain all this we have paid a cost which is extremely high. We are designed to survive the “nature’s way”, the sooner we all learn it the better. Change is a necessity but if it is positive for us and the nature, only then we have progressed.

Yes, plants and organisms are also changing but we cannot observe this change because of the mismatch of time frames. We can only witness the changes in species that have shorter life spans and high rates of reproduction like bacteria and viruses. And I am afraid the change occurring in plants and animals in this era would now be not in our favour.

Earth is changing in terms of its distribution and diversity of its constituents and some minor part of that is reversible but rest is not. If these changes (or some incident) tend to affect its overall momentum or motion then I think we all may be in trouble.

Yes, climate is changing mostly because of the anthropological activities of humans.

We can celebrate the changes made by us as mentioned above but I am afraid that this happiness would be short lived. That is because the beautiful diversity in plants and animals is the result of evolution that occurred over a very large period of time and has unmatched quality, especially not comparable to what we have done for just the sake of our comfort. Now, it is our responsibility to judge/understand this “CHANGE” and deal with it accordingly.

At the end, I would like to say that I have shared knowledge based on my ideas and other researchers may agree or disagree with them and all perspectives are equally welcome.

So, in the question, “or” should be replaced with an “=” sign and that is the answer.

Thank you.

Changing is the true process in the ecosystem and in the space, some a result of human activities and others as a universal dynamic process, there were many eras pass through the earth history occurred without human activities. In the space there are stars born and others disappeared.

Following

Thanks Carine Temegne Nono Khalid Hassan Rajkumar Dewani Joshua O. Ighalo for your interest and valuable contributions

As Heraclitus said: Panta rhei, everything flows. The true nature of Nature is flow, change. There is nothing static in the universe. Everything is in flow, even the genes themselves. Our rather static models of the world may be understandable and practical, yet, they do not correspond to the truth. Static entities are only in our minds as concepts, like geometric shapes from the point up to whatever x-dimensional form. It would be interesting to start to model reality and even geometry by flows as basic entities.

The answers of all these questions are yes.I like to thank for putting forward this burning questions for discussion. Changing is the general characteristics of the nature and this changes take place very slowly. On the other hand, changing of nature induced by anthropogenic impacts are very rapid as we are experiencing now-a-days by some natural repercussions. We will have to develop efficient methods to combat all these natural events.

Nature changes through evolution over millions of years. On the other hand, man changes nature at a much faster pace than the natural processes of evolution determined by changes in the living conditions of living organisms, e.g. by the slow process of shifting and changing the shape and location of individual continents, islands, etc. Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

I thinks - Only nature can turn the world upside down because it knows how to do it!