To all the followers of the above paper...

• In the recent paper “Misguided Statistical Process Monitoring Approaches” by W. Woodall, N. Saleh, M. Mahmoud, V. Tercero-Gómez, and S. Knoth, published in Advanced Statistical Methods in Process Monitoring, Finance, and Environmental Science, 2023, We read in the Abstract: Hundreds of papers on flawed statistical process monitoring (SPM) methods have appeared in the literature over the past decade or so. The presence of so many ill-advised methods, and so much incorrect theory, adversely affects the SPM research field. Critiques of some of the various misguided, and/or misrepresented, approaches have been published in the past 2 years in an effort to stem this tide. These critiques are briefly reviewed here. References…
• Excerpt 1. From the paper “Misguided Statistical Process Monitoring Approaches”

We agree with the authors in excerpt 1; unfortunately, they do not find the problem that many papers compute wrong Control Limits in CCs for Rare Events, with data exponentially or Weibull distributed. See …

What those followers can say about the problem?