'Out of sight and our grasp'

Is that because of our general approach?

If we change the approach and get some handles on what our instrumentation is failing to interface with then the matter would not be 'dark'.

If what you are saying is correct and what is 'dark' is related to the magnetic component of EM-R then an imaging system constructed from the magnetic component is likely to reveal aspects of what is currently 'dark'?

If what I am saying with respect to Vision-Space is correct then our own sense of vision has developed and incorporates a data-set that relies on the magnetic component of EM-R.

So this is a 'sight' issue and if we study our own sense of vision we can apply this aspect of 'sight' that eludes us at remote scales.

It's certainly not going to occur to our current instrumentation!

Dear John,

There is no such thing than magnetism alone in our reality. Its always electromagnetism even when it comes to a single rare-earth magnet. We need the electrons to interact with matter with the exception of gravity.

There is no any apparatus in our reality we can build that is purely magnetic.

The thing is there are no electrons in dark matter therefore we completely don't feel it, its totally invisible non existing to us even if it is multiple times denser than normal matter.

Does a fish in a bawl knows that it is in water?

Kind Regards,

Emmanouil

Thanks for that Emmanouil,

So polarisation of EM-R doesn't and couldn't separate them out?

If we are looking to a data-potential from the magnetic component its clear that our current instrumentation could not be used to detect it until is was transposed as a mechanobiological function.

J

Because the holographic property of the cosmos someone can decipher the inner workings of it just by observing nature here in our neighbor  on Earth and its reality. No need really to look outwards to the distant stars, all the information you need is holographically projected also for example inside the inner workings of  a humble magnet.

However the one weak point of holography is as you go deeper in  to smaller and smaller versions of the whole, some information gets lost. Here comes in,  intuition and logic deduction and science in general to restore the broken link. 

So in the above context here is a paradigm taken from nature which might explain the inner workings of a magnet and electromagnetism in general and their relation with dark matter and dark matter radiation:

 A stone (electric charge inside a magnet) is thrown from inside our atmosphere (light matter, magnet) on the calm surface (Bloch wall domain of a magnet) of a pond (dark matter and and dark energy). Dark matter is much more dense than light matter as air on water is, Immediately waves of water of certain height (dipole magnetism) are produced rising above the surface (Bloch wall) into the air (light matter). This is a dipole magnet.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0A8uTBvEiQRUkMzWEtrRFEtdU9xd2dwZjhrUS13V1VZOWtB/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dahyd45bwqhYbe0ShmXcP6wyDQq6cwEE/view?usp=sharing

"So polarisation of EM-R doesn't and couldn't separate them out?"

No.

Appreciate the response. Thanks...but it will take me a long time to get my head around it!

What I mean with respect to "separating them out" was allow them (the fields) to affect a sensor (cells) on an independent basis.

Your sensor is made out from electrons...

Some empirical glues that Bloch domain wall of a magnet might be something totally different from what we believe:

https://malagabay.wordpress.com/2013/08/03/black-and-white-bloch/

Emmanouil. What about passive induction? My little fantasy has this playing into the cell nucleus causing nuclear speckles. This then playing in the Ca2+ singling. So the critical interface would be with the cell nucleus and the it's reaction to set up the speckles.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_nucleus

Could this be linked to colour bloch. You realise I don't have a clue about the science of this! I just require something to stack up.

This uses all the right words....but they might not be necessarily in the right order! Which means I have yet to understand it!

Article Superfluid Bloch dynamics in an incommensurate lattice

There is of course the sensitivity to the earth's magnetic field in the retina of birds and some mammals and we have the same proteins in our retina. The idea would be that we don't 'detect' the earth's field to provide orientation, instead we 'detect' something from the magnetic component of EMR to deliver proximity awareness.

None of these things 'line up properly' in a way that I can understand at present. It would have to be something new.

as magnetism is unified with electics I it should not be dark matter radiation.

Dear Emmanouil,

The most recent revolutionary view for magnetism that I read is next:

http://pcmhahn.wixsite.com/foamyether/forces

I copy from here:

"... So far, I have shown illustrations of particles that have symmetrical ether inflow patterns. This pattern represents a neutral particle. If you take the particle (ether knot) and twist it or rotate it, as in Figure 14a, you create a magnet and a charged particle.

That curved spiraled pattern you see around the particle is what causes a magnetic field to manifest. When you take foamy ether and bend it, you create a magnetic field. Figure 14b shows how the ether curves around a bar-magnet. "

Paul,

quote:

"as magnetism is unified with electics I it should not be dark matter radiation. "

That would be true if the electron was not a dipole magnet.

I agree with Demetris Christopoulos