04 April 2013 1 2K Report

The gene I am studying is downregulated during adipocyte differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells. However, this gene is useful for cell proliferation before induction. Thus, if I am going to study its role in differentiation, I have to bypass the proliferation effect from cell seeding to post-confluency because the RNAi cells grow slower than the control cells. I plan to plate as many RNAi cells as control cells when confluent(-2d), then wait two days more. If I do this, the control cells will still grow for two more days. Alternatively, I could directly plate RNAi cells as many as control cells at 2d post confluent, eg, number of d0 control cells is 10,000, then i directly seed 10,000 control and RNAi cells. thus, two cells are both directly reach the 2d post-confluency condition, in the facet of cell number at least. If this alternative method is ok to use, would I still need wait two more days to let them be 2d post-confluent, if they still need some time to exit the cell cycle?

Similar questions and discussions