Michelson-Morley's tests were interpreted based on a particle model for light long time ago. This mistake caused an illusion of an ether wind effect in the arm transverse to light motion in these tests. By using a more relevant interpretation, based on the wave model for light instead, we can see that this transverse effect is not real. To cover up for this error the absurd concept dilation of time was invented. So, Michelson's mistake long time ago gave us multiple time concepts and individual ageing and absurd physics. We need only ONE time concept.
This important mistake is described in the attached article. Take a look and judge by yourself.
John-Erik
The biggest problem of theoretical physics is that Einstein's relativity is considered holy and sacred since it venerates the light.
Here is the strongest disproof of Einstein's relativity, read it objectively :
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347203242_The_correct_formulas_of_Michelson-Morley_experiment
Furthermore, Einstein's theories can't stand against Ockham Razor. Here is my Physics letter that disproves all Einstein's principles.
Read it please objectively by following Ockham Razor :
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369143082_Physics_letter_Cosmical_observations_and_experiments_against_the_relativistic_explanations_of_the_Doppler_effect_and_the_Gravitational_effect_of_the_light
Dear Professor Persson,
I think the Michelson-Morley experiment actually proves the opposite to time-dilation. Because the light makes it back simultaneously, irrespective of the supposed motion of the apparatus carried along by the earth, then this means there is no "Relativity of Simultaneity". There is, in its stead an "Absolute character to Simultaneity"
The same is true of the Einstein-Light Clock. Again here was have an Absolute character to Simultaneity. The rays make it to the same place--- coincide in the moving and stationary systems.
So we have the extraordinary behaviour of light, but this does not mean time and space are altered. It just means we have the extraordinary behaviour of light.
Cf. https://www.researchgate.net/post/Does_Einsteins_Light-Clock_discussed_here_by_Professor_Cox_actually_demonstrate_the_reserve_conclusion_to_what_is_propounded
and
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_there_something_amiss_in_the_figure_that_purports_to_demonstrate_the_Relativity_of_Simultaneity_from_the_Relativity_of_Simultaneity_wiki_page
Gary
You are right, but we can explain it in another way, since we only have wave fronts and transverse ether wind falls inside the wave front and therefore has no effect on apparent light motion, although real light motion is changed.
From ___________ John-Erik
Preprint Animadversions upon the wiki figure purporting to demonstrat...
Preston
Fulfilling the prediction is not a proof since different theories can have the same prediction.
Michelson was wrong in 1887, since he used the (wrong) particle model for light and found in error an effect in transverse arm in his interferometer. . If we use the (correct) wave model we find that there is no effect in the reference arm. Therefore, no time dilation and no twin paradox and no SRT.
Miclelson's use of the wrong light model gave us SRT.
From __________________ John-Erik
The simplest proof that the above wiki diagram purporting to demonstrate the "Relativity of Simultaneity" is in error, is to simply reverse the flow of time.
ie. the rays are converging inwards instead of emanating outwards.
We then find, in the top figure, the rays arrive to the middle of the carriage simultaneously (at t=2).
But in the bottom figure, the rays arrive to the middle of the carriage "one after the other" (at t=2) –-- the rays arrive simultaneously off-middle.
So we have "two realities" at a very definite place : the middle of the carriage.
Preprint Further Animadversion upon the wiki figure purporting to dem...