I worked at an Indirect Potable Reuse Facility in California.
Look at the manuscript
Sgroi M., Roccaro P., Oelker G.L., Snyder S.A. (2015). N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) formation at an indirect potable reuse facility. Water Research, 70, 174-183.
There is a description of an indirect potable reuse facility. The notification limit for NDMA (a carcinogenic disinfection by-product) is 10 ng/L.
In California, wastewater intended for indirect potable reuse (IPR) is expected to comply with drinking water standards.
This is a good reference
Gerrity D., Snyder S.A. (2011). Review of ozone for water reuse application: Toxicity, regulations, and trace organic contaminant oxidation. Ozone: Science and Engineering, 33, 253-266
if you put your question a bit more precise you will get better answers. half europe is using Indirect Potable Reuse, whole singapore, 1/3 of the US...... take your pick
Maybe the longest experience based on long term an extensive monitoring data exists at Ruhrverband in Germany, where since nearly 100 years the drinking water supply for about 4 Mio inhabitants is performed from the river water where the waste water of more than 2 Mio inhabitants is discharged. The Rurhvalley Association (Ruhrverband) publishes every year a detailled report with all the data and reserach results (www.ruhrverband.de). There is a lot of literature published even in English related to your question.
by the way I fully agree with the comment of Kai Bester except for Singapore where it is definitely a direct reuse (mainly for industrial water supply).