My theory, the Hypergeometrical Universe Theory (HU) has three postulates:

  • The Universe is a lightspeed expanding hyperspherical hypersurface
  • Matter is made as polymers of the Fundamental Dilator (FD). FD is a coherence between stationary states of deformation of space. In other words, in HU's Universe there is nothing other than Time, Space and Deformed Space.
  • FD create a dilaton field (as the coherence tunnels from state to state and changes its footprint in the 3D hypersurface or its 3D displacement volume). The dilaton field is just the interference pattern from all the traveling metric waves. As it moves in the 4D spatial manifold, it will always land where it deforms space in phase with the local dilaton field (which includes the self-field). That is called the Quantum Lagrangian Principle (QLP) which replaces all laws of dynamics.

This allows me to propose a new model for Universe Creation: The Big Pop Cosmogenesis.

The Big Pop Cosmogenesis - replacement to the Big Bang

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHK-Lyb7NfM

Big Pop Article

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202201.0106/v1

as well as to predict the Universe Creation Dimensionality Probablity Distribution Function:

Probability:

Here, I explained why the Universe has four spatial dimensions by calculating the probability of universes of different dimensionalities.

https://www.quora.com/Can-Dr-Marco-Pereira-explain-WHY-we-live-in-a-3D-Universe/answer/Marco-Pereira-1

The Fundamental Dilator contains four phases: electron, proton, positron, and antiproton. Neutrinos are also explained by the model.

Here is the explanation:

https://hypergeometricaluniversenewsletter.quora.com/Can-you-explain-something-e-g-Hunds-Law-that-lived-rent-free-in-our-minds-as-a-postulate-in-simple-terms

It is based on the Fundamental Dilator Balls Diagram. If you reverse time in the FD sequence, that is equivalent to swapping the intermediate balls. Under those circumstances, the interaction between opposing spins electrons becomes two repulsions and two attractions or net zero interaction.

That explains what up to now had no explanation: WHY WOULDN'T TWO ELECTRONS REPEL EACH OTHER JUST BY HAVING OPPOSING SPINS?

It is clear that if one considers the electron as a solid spinning in 4D, that wouldn't be the case. The tunneling process is a requirement.

More Marco Pereira's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions