I'm asking because I just had an article come out in a journal that embargoes uploading an accepted manuscript on researchgate but allows me to post it to my personal web site.
I definitely think RG should stop trying to capture and build its own library of all the research content that we wish to cite or add to the site. As RG development is funded by venture capitalists it does raise concern re their long term business model and strategy...
'Internet publication' needs to be added as a category with a simple url field and the url field should be made available for all types of publication.
Thanks, it seems to me that allowing a link from researchgate to full text elsewhere (arXiv, personal sites, etc.) would be a good way to meet the legal restrictions while also allowing researchgate to serve as a more complete index of where to find full text not permissible to post here. I can add the link in the comment but it would be a nice feature.
EDIT: Thanks for the recommendations, but this is more of a complaint than a solution. See Tobias' post above for the solution which is a PDF that simply links elsewhere, or for an example of what it looks like, see: Chapter Using environmental metrics to promote sustainability and re...
If you haven't already, joint academia.edu. They allow such links. You could also include a one-sentence description of paper title and abstract and the link to the publisher.
I think that if you create a Project in ResearchGate you will be able to add a message to the project which can contain a URL to your paper on your website.
These are all great workarounds; I don't think any will result in Researchgate thinking that the full text is available so it would be lovely to have a tweak to address that too. Please let me know if my understanding of that is incorrect.
I think David's suggestion would work. Put title and abstract in a world file, add "Full text available from: LINK", convert it into a pdf and upload it to ResearchGate. I tried this two or three times and ResearchGate recognized it as full text available...
I wanted to note that a) I think Tobias' suggestion is the best, and you can see an example here: Chapter Using environmental metrics to promote sustainability and re...
but also b) another key part of this is to know how to legally host your PDF elsewhere in the first place and get in indexed by Google Scholar. I wrote a short guide here: http://sciencejon.blogspot.com/2018/03/tips-for-helping-people-to-find-your.html
I definitely think RG should stop trying to capture and build its own library of all the research content that we wish to cite or add to the site. As RG development is funded by venture capitalists it does raise concern re their long term business model and strategy...
'Internet publication' needs to be added as a category with a simple url field and the url field should be made available for all types of publication.
Completely agree with multiple other posters here: it is ridiculous to put copies of work and not links to somewhere else - in fact it's error prone, a violation of copyright terms a lot of the time, and it prevents me from monitoring meaningfully whether my work is being read.
Also, I can only think on one reason for researchgate to not implement this feature: to build a profile of full texts available directly through researchgate, a "walled garden" of sharing within and not outside. I'm sorry to say, this prevents me from trusting researchgate with my work.
I'm surprised that I can't simply supply a URL since making copies of so, well, 19th century. I understand why people might want a copy and they are free to do so. But references are more than just alternative. The documents today are more dynamic and also a URL allows authors to know more about the use. That said, the recipient can make a copy but as an option not a requirement.
(This is an area of expertise ... but I don't know how to express that)
There is another option: You upload the preprint file that you have archived on a preprint server (e.g. arxiv) and then you add the DOI from that server manually to the details (via Edit).
See my example that I have set up a couple of minutes ago:
Preprint The effectiveness of supported employment programs: Meta-reg...
I recently joined Academia and it requires that I upgrade to premium to see who viewed my profile, it doesn't give me the option to share the link to my publication(which is not open access). I am wondering what the benefits of using Academia are over Researchgate. I appreciate your views on this. Thanks
My take is, RG is a purely profit-focused enterprise that has little interest in responding to users' concerns unless it helps maximize their profitability. So I wouldn't hold my breath for changes on making hyperlinks an option. I once walked into their Berlin office with a question (was in town for a conference and was curious about this organization). They seemed utterly bewildered by a person walking in, and it took me 2 hours to get someone to speak with me. I just asked about their new algorithm that dropped thousands of "reads" overnight, and created the odd situation in which citations sometimes out number reads on a given article. The IT guy I spoke with was quite defensive, and said they had a secret methodology for measuring these things and it couldn't be shared. So much for transparency.
I will soon be posting my PhD thesis to my university's online research library. I am required to post the thesis there, which makes sense. It is an open repository so anyone can access it. Rather than reposting the thesis here, it makes sense to just put a link in RG to the university's research library. RG...what is the process for requesting this as a feature?