Is there a stellar equilibrium against gravitational collapse?
The idea of gravitational collapse can be traced back to the earliest solutions to Einstein's equations, but at this early stage there was no convincing evidence to support the idea. Furthermore, there were many theoretical gaps in the belief that a star could not contract beyond its critical radius.Gravitational collapse objects are a conceptual precursor to black holes, and their history illustrates how such a counterintuitive idea was accepted long before their existence was proven. A black hole is a strong field structure of space-time surrounded by a one-way membrane that contains a singularity. General relativity (GR) predicts that sufficiently massive objects will collapse into black holes. In fact, the first solution to Einstein's field equations implies the existence of black holes.
Abdul Malek added a reply
2 days ago
Abbas Kashani > "In fact, the first solution to Einstein's field equations implies the existence of black holes".
Einstein himself never accepted the notion of "black hole"; nor gravitational wave. These are the concoctions by official science to big-up Einstein's false theories of relativity.
On the question of "Black Hole", Albert Einstein (in whose name this big fraud is promoted) himself in a published paper (link Below) emphatically dismissed the possibility of "Back Holes" even in theory! The following is a copy of his conclusion at the end of this mathematically rich and lengthy publication: "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the "Schwarzschild singularities" do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters whose particles move along circular paths it does not seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The "Schwarzschild singularity" does not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light.
This investigation arose out of discussions the author conducted with Professor H. P. Robertson and with Drs. V. Bargmann and P. Bergmann on the mathematical and physical significance of the Schwarzschild singularity. The problem quite naturally leads to the question, answered by this paper in the negative, as to whether physical models are capable of exhibiting such a singularity." Albert Einstein. A. Einstein, The Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, Vol. 40, No. 4 (Oct., 1939), pp. 922-936
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8dd0/dfafef0c53c428fdc3b58f8099aafcf7d089.pdf
Abdul Malek added a reply
2 days ago
Einstein's theories of relativity and the dark/black cosmic Monsters are Fairy Tales, which have with no relevance to objective reality. Please see the following:
Momentum – the Archilles’ Heel of Causality-based Physics: The Root of Its Miseries - from the Quantum to the Cosmic : https://rajpub.com/index.php/jap/article/view/9682
What is Light, Really? A Quantum Dialectical View. Semantic scholar: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/What-is-Light%2C-Really-A-Quantum-Dialectical-View-Abdul/9652dee62901f5ab9289cb4498f10fd01869181b
New Physics II – Quantum-Dialectical Derivation of New Mass-Energy Relation Invalidates Einstein’s Famous Equation E = mc2 : https://rajpub.com/index.php/jap/article/view/9642
New Physics – The Negation of Einstein’s Theories of Relativity. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN PHYSICS, 22, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.24297/jap.v22i.9594
“The Mystery of the Lorentz Transform: A Reconstruction and Its Implications for Einstein's Theories of Relativity and cosmology” : INSPIRE>HEP: https://inspirehep.net/literature/2158754
Alexander Sobolev added a reply
2 days ago
Abbas Kashani
Foundations of the theory of gravity with a constraint. Gravitational energy of macroscopic bodis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-024-05723-7; arxiv:2312.02217v3
Warren Frisina added a reply
11 hours ago
Preliminary results of the dark energy survey, DESI, indicate that dark energy was more prevalent in the early universe, implying a time varying cosmological constant. Placing this variable on the right of general relativity and treating it as a driver of gravitation instead of a constant structural element, it can be shown that gravitational collapse singularities might be avoided.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/general-relativity-time-dependent-cosmological-constant-frisina-iefce/?trackingId=LBXjpSJHWlsZwmozsvtDFA%3D%3D