Your question explores a complex interplay of cognitive, social, cultural, and environmental factors in the context of human-made fires. Let’s break this down:

1. Cognitive Abilities and Intelligence Levels

• Decision-Making and Risk Perception: Higher cognitive abilities might enhance risk assessment, leading individuals to avoid behaviors that could unintentionally cause fires. Conversely, lower cognitive abilities could impair decision-making and awareness of fire hazards.
• Intentional vs. Unintentional Fires: Research suggests that some intentional fires (e.g., arson) may stem from psychological or behavioral issues unrelated to intelligence, such as antisocial behavior or impulse control disorders.
• Correlation Limitations: Intelligence is multifaceted and does not solely determine behavior. Emotional intelligence, social factors, and situational variables often interact with cognitive abilities.

2. Education and Awareness

• Impact of Education: Education often plays a critical role in promoting awareness about fire safety. For example, individuals educated about the risks of open flames, faulty wiring, or dry environmental conditions are less likely to cause accidental fires.
• Cultural Contexts: In some societies, traditional practices (e.g., slash-and-burn agriculture) may increase fire risks, regardless of individual cognitive abilities. In such contexts, education about sustainable practices is key.

3. Societal, Cultural, and Environmental Contexts

• Societal Norms: Social attitudes toward fire-related behaviors, such as smoking or firework use, significantly affect fire incidents. In some societies, stricter norms and regulations minimize fire risks.
• Economic Factors: In resource-poor settings, individuals may resort to risky behaviors, like using unsafe heating or cooking methods, increasing the likelihood of fires.
• Environmental Factors: In regions prone to wildfires, human activity, whether intentional or unintentional, is often a contributing factor. Risk perception in such areas might be shaped by education, past experiences, and community norms.

4. Potential Avenues for Research

• Behavioral Analysis: Understanding how cognitive biases, such as overconfidence in managing fire-related tasks, lead to fire incidents.
• Cross-Cultural Studies: Examining how fire safety education varies across cultures and influences behavior.
• Policy Implications: Investigating how societal infrastructure and policies (e.g., fire codes, public awareness campaigns) mitigate risks.

This topic would benefit from interdisciplinary research combining cognitive science, sociology, public health, and environmental studies.

Hadj Miloua Seems so:

"198,133 (17.9%) men had at least one hospital admission for any unintentional injury during follow-up. The most common cause of unintentional injury was falling, followed by road accidents, poisoning, fire and drowning. In addition, 14,637 (1.3%) men had at least one admission for complications of medical care. After adjusting for confounding variables, lower IQ scores were associated with an elevated risk of any unintentional injury (Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) per standard deviation decrease in IQ: 1.15 (1.14, 1.15)), and of cause-specific injuries other than drowning (poisoning (1.53 (1.49, 1.57)), fire (1.36 (1.31, 1.41)), road traffic accidents (1.25 (1.23, 1.26)), medical complications (1.20 (1.18, 1.22)), and falling (1.17 (1.16, 1.18)). These gradients were stepwise across the full IQ range."

Article Intelligence in early adulthood and subsequent risk of unint...