I see many scales for assessing one's susceptibility to social influence but am having trouble finding one that assesses how influential on others one believes themself to be.
I have never come across a scale that would assess one’s self-perception of their influence on others. I think this idea should begin with the question: “Is it possible to be truly objective when assessing self-perception of an aspect of personality, the importance of which is based in ego?” Assessing the perception of influence of another is a fairly routine survey.
T. Phillip Madison While there are numerous scales available for assessing an individual's susceptibility to social influence, such as the Asch Conformity Scale or the Compliance Gaining Strategies Scale, there appears to be a gap in standardized scales specifically designed to assess self-perceived influence on others. However, it's possible to adapt existing scales or develop new measures to assess this construct. Below are some suggestions for creating a measurement scale for assessing self-perception of influence on others:
Item Generation: Begin by generating a pool of items that reflect different aspects of perceived influence on others. These items could assess beliefs about one's ability to persuade others, exert authority or leadership, inspire change, or influence group dynamics. Consider drawing from relevant theories of social influence, leadership, and persuasion to inform item development.
Expert Review: Seek input from experts in the fields of social psychology, leadership, and communication to review and refine the items for clarity, relevance, and comprehensiveness. Experts can provide valuable insights into the conceptualization and measurement of perceived influence on others.
Pilot Testing: Conduct pilot testing of the initial scale with a small sample of individuals to assess item clarity, reliability, and validity. Use qualitative methods, such as cognitive interviews or think-aloud protocols, to gather feedback on the comprehension and interpretation of the items.
Scale Refinement: Based on pilot testing feedback and psychometric analyses, refine the scale items to improve reliability and validity. This may involve revising or removing ambiguous items, modifying response options, or rewording items for clarity and precision.
Validation Studies: Administer the revised scale to a larger, more diverse sample to evaluate its psychometric properties, including internal consistency, test-retest reliability, factorial validity, and criterion-related validity. Compare scores on the scale with relevant criteria, such as actual influence behaviors or peer ratings of influence, to establish construct validity.
Normative Data: Establish normative data for the scale based on a representative sample of the target population. This allows for comparisons of individual scores to population norms and facilitates interpretation of scale scores.
Cross-Cultural Validation: If applicable, conduct cross-cultural validation studies to assess the generalizability of the scale across different cultural contexts. Adapt the scale as needed to ensure its validity and reliability in diverse cultural settings.
By following these steps, researchers can develop a standardized scale for assessing self-perceived influence on others, filling a notable gap in the existing literature on social influence assessment. This scale can contribute to our understanding of individual differences in perceived influence and inform research on leadership, persuasion, and interpersonal dynamics.