Assume that an author X proposed a statement (S).
The RG members using a concrete proof judge (S) as a wrong claim.
X insisted (S) is right based on some cheap Journal publications.
I think such Journals collect publishing fees by hunting ignorant people, showing them a fake high impact factor for this purpose, publishing the results without reviewing them.
The catastrophe is that the authors themselves assumed their results are right!
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publications
More Issam Kaddoura's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions