Note:
Professor Tepper Gill (Howard University, Washington DC, USA), who had authored before nice monographs and research articles on modern theoretical physics problems, - sent me for discussion his new and very interesting manuscripts devoted to some unsolved and hot problems of modern both relativistic and quantum physics.
I would be happy if all of you to get familiar with these manuscripts and next shared both with each other and with Prof. Tepper Gill the corresponding scrutinized comments and remarks, which would be as interesting as important for further research progress in this so intriguing field of theoretical physics.
With warm and sincere regards,
Prof.dr hab. Anatolij K. Prykarpatski
P. S.
It is assumed that the "Twins Paradox" is explained by means of the related Lorentz transformations applied to two point-like objects moving relatively to each other and performing a suitably accelarated reverse motion. Yet, in recent very interesting articles by Prof. Tepper Gill (Goward University, Washingto. DC, USA), gointly with coauthors, suggested in part its new explanation, based on the temporal transformations inconsistency of two different point-like objects, as in this case they, as observers, can not use their clock information and share to each other. Details can be found in articles attached.
Dear Anatolij,
the "twin effect" is the measured outcome of at least a couple of famous experiments: the muon ring experiment and the Hafele and keating.
The Yves and Still well and the Kundig experiment testify the presence of the time dilation which occurs if an oscillator moves in regards to another one which is at rest in a stationary laboratory.
It has been extensively disputed if SR can or cannot account for such phenomena...
What emerged from recent discussions is that SR provides the right result about times elapsed only when the twins overlap again after their separation.
SR does provide wrong, unreal values instead, whenever clocks are still separated. A weird jump of the counting of the moving clock is calculated by SR as soon as it reverts its direction in the return trip. Those intermediate quantities are unacceptable and are the consequences of the non experimentally verified relativity of simultaneity.
The paper you are presenting goes far beyond the problem of the twins though.
My main interest in the problem under regard lies in solving the problem of constructing two and manyparticle relativistic Hamiltonians, modulo taking into account the awful inconsistency in determing common temporal moment of two relativistic particles, what was sharply singled out in the Gill"s articles attached.
All other reasonings, related to the problem, are more or less understood and not so important for solving the problem, as you tacitly also mentioned.
Best regards!
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Higher Education
- Universities