Force fields, including the gravitational field, contain an energy density. We therefor can exclude that a field source, moving with constant velocity, does permanently emit its static field. Providing the field energy content again and again would exhaust the field source.
We therefor must conclude that force fields are co-moving with its source as long as the source is not accelerated. But according to the co-movement, any local field strength value is instantaneously valid without any retarded transmission from the field source.
In cosmic distances it makes a tremendous difference if the proposed field retardation is real or not.
The consequence is that all calculations of galaxy dynamics are wrong, if they are based on that alleged retardations. Only the impact of accelerated movements is retarded.
Preston Guynn "One way light from the farthest reaches of the universe reaches us within a few microseconds"
thank you for your extensive comment, which focuses one way light. Could you explain what "one way light is". How can it be created and detected?
Yes. All the inertial field part as a gravitational sink moves uniformly, including curved trajectories - they are programmed into the structure of spacetime. Instead, higher-order changes, changes in the merging of field parts into each other, act as causal signals. This, understood to the end, produces continuous field dynamics where "being inside a 4-structure as inside a medium" and gravity is mainly closer to 1/r than 1/r² relative to the long-distance dominant center. The energy content of the space-time structure would be far more significant than has been thought: 75% of the total energy of matter, leaving 25% for visible matter. This is obtained on average from the 4 dimensions of the manifold.
Esa Säkkinen "Yes. All the inertial field part as a gravitational sink moves uniformly, including curved trajectories - they are programmed into the structure of spacetime."
Does this mean that the question about retardation, as mentioned in the title is denied? The conjecture is that gravitational fields are co-moving with inertially moving field sources. In this case (non accelerated movement) the field appears everywhere with a field amplitude, matching to the current source position without retardation.
Wolfgang Konle
Yes - the first-order dynamics of the gravitational field is comoving and no aberration effects occur. They are spherical in nature, but quadrupolic and more complicated phenomena mean signals and energy density evolution.
When the field parts merge, signals are needed, but they only occur where the field geometry changes, not via the sink/source center.
Dear Wolfgang ( ).
Here is this experiment:
Research Proposal Addendum to 'A Simple Experiment to Support an EM Gravity Theory'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5dZ3VQXf6A
What do you think about it?
I don't have the money to do it
I know under what conditions it could be done
Do you axcept the propagated propageted reslt by me?
If the result I expect is wrong, then Einstein's idea also becomes unacceptable. If it is good, then a serious step forward could be achieved in the theoretical explanation of gravity.
Regards,
Laszlo
László Attila Horváth
Yes, I think that you can measure a weight difference between the two orientations of your tube. But instead of gold or platin you simply can use a 20kg weight disk from the gym. We simply can calculate the expected weight difference. We know g is proportional to 1/r². The weigth difference then is 1/R²/(1/(R+d)²)=(R+d)²/R²=(R²+2Rd +d²)/R²=1+2d/R.
R=6370km, let us set d=5m. We then get 1+2d/R=1+1/637000.
The weight difference then is 20kg/637000=0.031g.
The most expensive part in that experiment would be to find a scale capable to measure differences in the range of 30mg between masses in the range of 20 kg.
But I do not see any theoretic consequences of that experiment.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Physiology
- Physiological Processes
- Stress