Is the nanotechnology considered as innovation or invention and why?

More Najlah Alrashidi's questions See All

Im looking to a book or article?

Iam looking to for a book or an article that including this informations "explaining why the Nano artworks not showing the public in museum the real technologie of Nano.... because of, the...

03 April 2019 6,322 2 View

Is nanotechnology part of materials science? Is it possible to obtain Pico technology and move from hypothesis to application?

Pico-scale This is three orders of magnitude smaller than a nanometer (and thus most nanotechnology) and two orders of magnitude smaller than most chemistry transformations and measurements. Pico...

18 February 2021 4,540 5 View

Student writing his own Learning Outcomes - is this the way forward?

'Students just dont want to study; they are here to waste time!' I have heard this phrase many times; so are the students solely to be blamed? We will find many students who just dont seem to...

04 February 2021 8,546 22 View

Could you please suggest to me an interesting and good book about Nanotechnology?

I want to know about nanotechnology from beginning to professional. Thus I want some book in this area

01 February 2021 1,889 13 View

How Nanotechnology helps to develop various products in Agrometeorology?

Nanotechnology (NT) is one of the advanced material science with which the development in materials and improvement in electronics. NT has made it possible to miniaturizing the things to fit in...

21 January 2021 2,305 6 View

Can you suggest literature studying the conditions information and evidence can influence manager decisions in social impact sectors?

I am working on improving the use of digital innovations at scale globally. Most of the innovations I work with provide relevant knowledge on improving the performance of projects, programs, and...

16 January 2021 1,120 5 View

One invention granted for the US and European patent will be counted as one patent or 2 patents for CV writing?

05 January 2021 8,135 4 View

Any recommendation to calculate time to dominant design emergence?

01 January 2021 3,809 5 View

Are drones following the e-Auto industry technological trajectory or are they following its own?

* Are drones following the e-Auto industry technological trajectory or it is following its own? * Will drones diffuse faster than electrical vehicles? * Will it depend on the application?, What...

29 December 2020 7,379 3 View

What is your opinion that the best ways to increase the efficiency of public authorities?

On the latest innovative methods of effective organization of public authorities or effective mechanisms in practice

29 December 2020 6,413 2 View

How best can Agricultural Innovation be structured to ensure adequate uptake and farmers adoption?

Technology adoption rates amongst small-scale farmers in the Global South (e.g. Africa) remain low, even when scientific evidence shows that a particular technology is beneficial.

28 December 2020 4,786 23 View

Michel Héry

General considerations on the past and future of nanotechnologies that might help you:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308414172_Manufactured_Nanomaterials_by_2030_-_Workplace_health_and_safety_consequences_in_small_businesses_in_France

Md. Aminul Islam

Please read my M. Phil Thesis http://lib.buet.ac.bd:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1522

Franklin Uriel Parás Hernández

In my opinion: neither.

Nanotechnology is an area of applied physics, chemistry and biology. its concepts and the problems it addreses are part of these three natural sciences.

It is not a fundamental science, since its foundations are sustained on fundamental sciences.

It is not a field of engineering since it doesn't look for solving technological problems exclusively and/or innovate for goods that increase people's life quality.

Is not an innovation, since Nanotechnology at the base is just a concept, an approach. The innovation could be the final product which may be created from the deep understanding of a given phenomenon observed in a particular branch of science. And even less and invention, since the first people who started to use the term "Nanotechnology" didn't invent anything, they just gave a name to an approach, based on things we had previously invented: Quantum mechanics, electornics, molecular physics, solid state physics, etc. .. my opinion.

Regards ! :)