Is physics ill: The Big-Bang Blunder seen as an Informatics Problem
Otto E. Rossler
Faculty of Mathematics and Science, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 8, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
(February 27, 2015; October 11, 2020)
------------------------
Introduction
A collective blunder or swindle in science consists in the systematic neglect of facts against better knowledge. Big groups tend to form a big consensus, while several small groups supporting differing common opinions give the truth a better chance to be captured. Especially so when a certain myth-by-consensus has reached a level of public consciousness that covers the whole planet. This is the case with the Big Bang Theory to date: Valid counterproofs have no chance to get accepted or even discussed. Thomas Kuhn wrote in the footsteps of Max Planck about this collective 30-years phenomenon.
In the present case, the situation is compounded by the fact that the old gospel enables a “Big Bang Experiment” to be performed down on earth any time soon – even though the artificial temperatures thereby generated have never existed before anywhere in the universe. The public has no chance to get informed about the “David-Goliath battle” that is raging for years between the “cc school” (cryodynamics; c-global) and the brain-washed majority (BWM) if that characterization is not too harsh a verdict.
Results
i) Cryodynamics is a new fundamental discipline in physics, being the twin sister of venerable Thermodynamics. Like the latter it is in the last instance based on deterministic Hamiltonian-chaos theory in the footsteps of Henri Poincaré. The science of informatics is the natural home of both theories to date. Informatics grew out of probabilistic questions having to do with the transmission of messages. Its statistical nature has to do with the discreteness of the states assumed to exist. By contrast, deterministic chaos theory is based on the continuum and as such represents an even more fundamental theory. Alerting scientists in the field of informatics to the new deterministic statistical mechanics first seen by Yakov Sinai in 1963 makes maximum sense. The “paradoxical cooling” by hotter particles which surprisingly occurs under a condition of mutual attraction, promises unlimited free energy down on earth soon based on interactive cooling in a continuous hot-plasma reactor [1].
ii) c-global represents a return to the year 1907 in Einstein’s gravitation theory, to just before the “non-global c” entered in a way that only today can be fully clarified. The retrieved global c extends now to the region downstairs because Einstein’s famous gravitational redshift down there is automatically accompanied by a proportional if optically masked size increase and mass decrease [1]. The Viennese physicist Roman Sexl came close. The relativistic approach profits from an information-sciences based reasoning.
Discussion
Both discoveries – the size increase and the mass decrease – eluded finding for more than a century. The fact that they mutually support each other adds to their importance in the field of informatics. The Big Bang Theory which they topple no doubt represents the best-known physics theory of all time.
The two results referred-to above belong to two different fields – conventional physics and relativistic physics. They support each other by independently ruling out the Big Bang. The popular international TV series of that name (“The Big Bang Theory”) represents an ideal forum for bringing the two results to public attention. Now, the same effect is about to be reached on an informatics forum. At issue is “the great silence” which for ten years greets the two new results in the public domain. It will be an experience to discuss them with my audience in Vienna. The latter will no doubt audaciously defend the current cosmological gospel. The latter as everyone knows insists on a written note having been left inside the cosmos reading “created 13.82 billion years ago.”
Conclusion
For the first time in history, the young generation – the largest of history – is equipped with a giant voice of its own, in the analysis of the genome. It so happens that another information-science based discipline – deterministic chaos theory – likewise gives this generation a powerful tool and vigorous voice. The two twin results highlighted above – Cryodynamics and c-global – can each be expressed in an information-science framework. A powerful argument in favor of this approach lies in Paul Dirac’s phrase “important results are simple.” Saint Augustine last said that the cosmos may well have been created ten minutes ago along with its infinite past and future. This type of free thinking finds its revival to date.
Acknowledgments
I thank György Darvas for a discussion.
Reference
A. Sanayei and O.E. Rossler, Chaotic Harmony – A Dialog about Physics, Complexity and Life. Springer Verlag 2014.
The matter of pathology of science burns down to the financial mechanism, i.e. the age-old supremacy race of political and economic enteties, currently US/China.
We have no real science of life or a working connection between science and life.
Science is mainly dedicated to study dead matter and observe external material conditions.
In this respect, with reference to the sanity of science, we are facing not an acute illness, but a chronic disease.
The cure would be to connect science and life, i.e. to focus on the science of life, with due respect of all dead matter facts and findings.
Such a mental balance can put science back into the sane field of healthy life applications, without al these pathological and perfected artifacts, caused by deep (biological) human rivalry and domination of the other.
I would say that the equivalence principle is both maximally simple and maximally hard to fully appreciate.
Dear Otto E. Rossler,
Greetings, I think that until the Unified Field Theory is discover, physics will be ill!
Regards, Saeed
- Badges
- Science topic