27 August 2014 46 2K Report

In Before and Beyond Representation, Lambros Malafouris’ proposes that enactive mark-making bootstrapped the Paleolithic mind into representation, both internal and external, This allows that representation may not be an innate capability, but a property of human culture, propagated via cultural training.What evidence do we have, ie in developmental psychology or anthropology or neurology, that internal representation is either innate or learned?

More Simon Penny's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions