There will be tremendous amount of retrospective data available in all the institution but why the preceptors choose cohort studies instead of Case control studies even though they know 3 years time they can't prove the objective of the study?
Case-control studies can yield important scientific findings with relatively little time, money, and effort compared with other study designs. Investigators implement case-control studies more frequently than any other analytical epidemiological study. Unfortunately, case-control designs also tend to be more susceptible to biases than other comparative studies. Although easier to do, they are also easier to do wrong. A good design should aim to minimise error and bias. All remaining sources of error and bias should be recognised and decisively evaluated. Case-control studies that are well designed and carefully done can provide useful and reliable results. Few case control study projects done by the authors are given as examples in this book for the medical professional to learn and write their manuscript. Investigators must, however, devote painstaking attention to the selection of control groups and to measurement of exposure information. When the number of cases is small, the ratio of controls to cases can be raised to improve the ability to find important differences.
http://www.amazon.com/Case-Control-Studies-Medical-Research/dp/3659238864
It is very difficult to conduct cohort study during yr residency period..attrition problem is frequent due to loss of follow up and study is also expensive.so for PG student it is not affordable too..cross sectional study is best according to me for residency period
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Medicine
- Epidemiology