I want to publish my paper and Is it necessary to add a supervisor in my Research paper?
Or any chances of acceptance without a supervisor ??
Simply, it depends on a real contribution rates for each collaborator within the assigned manuscript.
I recommend this post:
https://www.researchgate.net/post/When_should_a_PhD_supervisor_be_credit_as_co-author
As Anton has highlighted - this is an often asked question - with some very good research threads out there. The simple answer is - if the supervisor has not contributed in any meaningful way - then they do not have to be acknowledged. However, this can be fraught with issues - arguments, supervisors 'black-listing' your reputation etc. The only clear line of defence is to draw up an agreed formal contract at the beginning of any supervisory arrangement to clarify what the exact position and expectations are - for all parties concerned.
Simply, it depends on a real contribution rates for each collaborator within the assigned manuscript.
I recommend to add co-author and work together.
Supervisor for long term research
The supervisor's name is not absolutely necessary, however if some help has been taken from the supervisor during writing the manuscript, then this should be acknowledged.
Please notice that many of the best journals now request a summary of contributions. As for everything in science HONESTY IS THE POLICY.
Hi Muhammad, If you wrote the paper lonely it does not necessary to add a supervisor. Actually, the important point is quality of your paper.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Methodology
- Research Methodology
- Research Papers