The error of building a physical world based on the basic feelings of fundamental concepts such as space and time occurred during the creation of Newtonian mechanics by Newton. Of course, this mistake should have been made, so that man would not be deprived of the numerous gifts of technology resulting from this science! But when the world showed another face of itself to man in very small and large scales, this theory along with the error did nothing.
When Newton had those ideas about space and time (of course, maybe he knew and had no choice), he built a mathematical system for his thoughts, differential and integral calculus! Mathematics resulting from his thoughts was a systematic continuation of his thoughts, with the same assumptions about space and time. That mathematics could not show him the right way to know the real world! Because the world was not Newtonian! Today, many pages in modern physics are created based on new assumptions of space and time and other seemingly obvious variables!
Now, why do we think that these pages of current mathematics necessarily lead to the correct knowledge of the world! Can we finally identify the world, as it is, by adopting appropriate and correct assumptions?!
Our worldview determines the reality of the world. Our worldview is the interpretative glasses we wear. There are several pairs of glasses scientists use. There are the glasses of atomism that give the reality of a split and fragmented world, and then there are the glasses of wholeness that provide the reality of a totally interconnected world. First, choose your glasses as that choice will determine the reality of your world.
Andrew Lohrey:
Thank you for your beautiful statement, but I really want to know what operational and structural mechanism has led to this kind of view of the world?!
In interpreting the results of quantum mechanics, some physics scientists consider the principle of the unity of the observer and the object in an atomic and subatomic experiment! So that they can express the inherent problems of the difference between quantum mechanics and classical physics! But no one has introduced a structure for it. In fact, why does the world behave like this in interaction with our understanding powers?
Good question. I suggest that the background structure for science research, which includes quantum mechanics is consciousness. Yet consciousness is deleted from mainstream science, hence for such research, there is no background structure. Two papers in the Journal Communicative and Integrative Biology discuss this situation: Omni-local consciousness: Article Omni-local consciousness
and The two principles that shape scientific research:Article The two principles that shape scientific research
Andrew Lohrey, Thanks for your attention;
The concept of looking with glasses is a conventional and interesting concept, so, from this point of view, it should be concluded that there is no single objective world? And it is human consciousness and its inevitable effects that determine the shape of the world for humans? Or is there a world rich in all possible forms that will take a specific form after the impact of consciousness? From this point of view, this rich world must be the same as the quantum wave function of the world! This discussion is ongoing and we cannot ignore the effects of this model in other parts of the world!
In order to identify the world as it is, one would have to view it from every possible perspective, every possible angle. Who can do that?
ِLeonard Mehlmauer;
Implicitly, this is what I mean by posing this question, the world has an infinite existence and this infinity is both in dimensions and in the forms it can take! It is as if the world accepts what we dictate to it and becomes what we want! But if this idea is true, are there physical and scientific structures that satisfy it?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Science
- Media
- Journalism