Library budgets are are getting smaller and smaller and integrated library systems can eat up a good portion of this already limited budget. Should Librarians start looking more at Open Source Systems and why or why not?
It depends on your needs and funds. If you can afford dedicated person(s) to install, update and maintain software then you can go open source. But if you don't (as in our library), then it would be better to buy such a software.
The important issue in both licensing models is "openness" of the data format you put into the system. Is it open or proprietary? The latter will cause problems in future when you want to change software but keep your data. Some "open" systems may use closed formats and needs similar services as for migration in closed systems. It adds to costs.
yes, in the undeveloped countries it's a good idea and it's better to have a very professional programmer to improve the open source integrated library.
Due to reduction in library budget year-in year-out, the visible solution for automating and integrating library operations may well depend on the use of open source software, most importantly in developing nations.
I absolutely agree with the responses. Most libraries in developing and underdeveloped countries and even some in developed countries cannot afford to purchase the ILS. These systems are very expensive and seem to be getting more and more so. As indicated the problem can come when it is time for support but this can be dealt with through training library staff.
The Cost implications for both is almost the same. With open source you will steel need to employ of pay a consultant for maintenance and customisation. If you have somebody inside already who is good in systems and programing, going open source might be the good idea.