I need to explain if I need to discuss the methodology of each reviewed paper?
Concerning the topic Achievement and literature review note the following: 1. It is compulsory to review what researchers have earlier done in the area of Achievement. For each study, show the problematic, the objectives of the research, the methods used by the researcher in conducting the research, the major findings of the study, its original contribution to knowledge, recommendations and limitations of the study.From these you will be able to state how your study differs from the earlier ones.If there is no dofference then drop the idea because it will only be tantamount to replicating what has already been done. Notice, this is the essence of literature review, to establish the originality of your intended study. 2. In literature review, the whole title is considered; all the key terms are necessary to be subjected to literature review. Take, for example: Immigration and Racism in Allain Mabanckou's Black bazar.The key terms in this title are:immigration and racism.You will review the two terms in general. Also, you will review them in relation to Alain Mabanckou's works in general and finally in respect to the corpus de base, i.e. the study text which is Black bazar.Sometimes the review is on comments and observations and you simply examine them.But when it is a study, you follow the earlier mentioned steps.Remember as a researcher that you are delving into an area where people have been working. Therefore, you have to acknowledge what has been done pertinent to your area of study before trying to establish your own authority in the field. You move from the general to the particular.
Agree with Ifeoma Onyemelukwe.
But applying it is difficult to come up with all right conclusions.
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Methodology