No.

In 1949 Albert Einstein recommended such a concept in his Autobiographical Notes. Other writers of GR have resisted this concept. One reason for rejection is the zero velocity reference it requires. GR allows any reference to be chosen as zero velocity, but does not prefer one frame over another.

QFT has accepted the Einstein point of view but has other difficulties. Other researchers have provided a remedy by using Lagrangian Density to represent the energies.

While the improved QFT addresses the quantum inertial fields, this present question is asking if the inertial fields can be extended to larger objects.

Very interesting point about relativity as indeed any reference could be considered as "the zero points". However, when one frame of reference changes direction, this symmetry is lost which is evidenced in the twins paradox when the space-traveling twin changes direction and returns to earth and his earth-bound brother.

Inertia is the "balanced force vector" of zero acceleration. Change in direction is considered angular momentum which contrasts with the concept of inertial balance.

Twins paradox is resolved by triplets, two of whom travel in different directions at same acceleration, returning to origin at a preset time. The travelers have aged the same but less than the other triplet in agreement with SR. But SR has given the travelers an incorrect prediction of each other. SR is valid and useful when used correctly, but often misused.

Isotropic CMB is convenient as a zero velocity reference in the case of an object changing direction because it is the same in every direction.

Turning of a moving object is resisted by a force, giving support to the concept of inertia in a stress energy field.

Curiously, if the triplets had offspring while the two who travel off in different directions return, the two who travel in opposite directions would find that their children would be children to the adult children of the third triplet who remained at their point of origin. The ground of the CMB is also asymmetrical and therefore non-linear resulting in differential formativeness vis a vis non-uniform directionality meaning acceleration. Therefore, inertia as a balanced figure/ground state is contradicted with the introduction of any stress

-energy field in such an asymmetrical context. What we have here are mutually exclusive paradigms attempting to create and co-exist into a "singularity" state of confusion.

Interesting comments. For every paradox there is a false assumption or more than one. Philosophers like to continue the paradox from one generation to the next, while researchers prefer to discover the assumptions and examine them from time to time.

Asymmetrical appearance of CMB is removed for an observer sent from Earth to travel in a direction of Earth coordinates Declination minus 15 degrees and Rigth Ascension 23 hours at speed 382 +/-2 km/second. The asymmetry is just evidence of how the Earth is moving with respect to the isotropic CMB. Many researchers have written about this.

Offspring of triplets with age differences depend on when the births have occurred, how long the journey was and the accelerations used in travel.

Special relativity is a useful tool that gives correct predictions when used correctly. Often it is not used correctly.

If inertia did not travel in stress energy fields, then there is no reason there should be any force opposing the turning of a moving object from one path to another.

Challenging assumptions is the only way star travel will ever be achieved, because the assumptions say it will never happen. Natures of space and time are assumptions that can be challenged. The technical problems are less than the social problems. Our society may be too dangerous to turn loose in star travel with next generation technology, hopefully not.

In several of my threads I am asking how dangerous we are to stability of space and time, and can the risk be mitigated by rational thought and physical precautions, a type of environmentalism.

The present question is a part of the larger discussion. You can find work of other researchers under the topic The Big Rip.

Was it the poet Keats who said, "you can look at a grain of sand in your hand and see the universe"? Like Russian dolls, there are infinite levels of embedded, interlaced organizational levels of "infinities" at multidimensional levels. The quantum exchange of energy relating to Planck's constant h is a proportional conversion ratio of waves frequency to energy. Resonance could therefore occur at and be transduced throughout many of these multi-dimensional levels of the universe and it starts with "Consciousness the size of a grain of sand" that could evolve like the non-isotropic CMB that was born in the quantum fluctuations of the BIG BANG epigenetic "DNA" of the universe generating both differentiation and unification of stars, solar systems, galaxies, clusters of galaxies, etc. The expansion of differential mappings of the universe reflects anything but uniformity as the space telescopes have mapped the rich variations observed beyond the directionality of being earthbound. The free-falling state of inertia is altered when it "hits the ground of being in contact with the source of spacetime curvature. The transduction of inertia into acceleration when its angular momentum shifts from moving on time to moving in space. That is where framedragging could occur. The pursuit of an isotropic universe of zero-point acceleration is suitable for relativistic concerns. However, what seems paradoxical (regardless of how paradoxes are themselves apparent illusions) is an enigma that anything in the universe is an absolute starting point. Hopefully, humanity's ego of playing dice with the universe seeking absolute unification of a unified field will be pursued with scientific humility to indeed challenge false assumptions appearing real even when they feel and perceptually are experienced as absolute only to be overturned in the next generation of star children.

Definitely, we want to bring health and wellness to the stars and release the toxicity of ego and self-preoccupation allowing for the co-existence of life forms wherever and whenever we travel with a Bon Voyage!