Is a human cognitive-developmental ethology/ethogram theory the only one that posits (at least at its inception) that we can discover everything? AND, does only it show all the things that really are just made-up people-within-the-person (homunculi) as such, and show they are totally unnecessary? I believe so (on both counts). It does both BECAUSE perception (perception/attention) is always a major focus (of experience and learning) and will always be UNLESS it becomes untenable -- and then we will fix it PROPERLY. (True ethology inherently guides one to self-correction AS NEEDED: realize this and then see the shame in abandoning ethology.) Human cognitive developmentalists: hope to get your attention! (See Project, link below)
[Please also read the next Project Log entry.]
Article A Human Ethogram: Its Scientific Acceptability and Importanc...
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Psychology
- Mental Processes
- Learning