Dynamics etymologigally means "competition of forces" i.e it does not convey anything about kinematical or motional connotations.Despite of this, in physics it is used as term for the marriage of kinetics and forcive physics.
Despite these linguistic confussions or mishaps, dynamics if a functional domain in its relation to kinetics, nevertheless. It is, in the theoretical realm, the precursor to kinetics i.e it mothers equations of motion.
In field theory, the conceptual counterpart to dynamics is "field equations". Whst culd a different name that convey the same motherhood relation to classical kinetics be, to spare dynamics?
It should bank on your angle. The expository discourse is confusing though...
From a Semantics/Pragmatics standpoint, "spar" and "spare" don't fit in the same thematic clustering. Are you looking to use them synonymously?
Apologies for not being able to help you in a more specific manner.
Best of luck with your research.
Iphigeneia Mariou,
You are right the expositiry discourse is confusing. No, the term is widely accepted and not contested- its meaning is emergent by culture and frequence and reliable type of use, mostly. But i think it is not the best term and prevents seeing things in the purest way they are in reality
- Badges
- Science topic