DFT+U refers to a general method to describe localized electrons. GGA+U is a specific case of DFT+U, where the underlying exchange-correlation functional is GGA (like PBE+U).
Example: DFT+U can be a general term referring to GGA+U, LDA+U, etc.
Almost same, but specifically GGA+U should be the way to go unless you also added LDA+U in your caculation. DFT+U can be LDA+U or GGA+U or both, there is somewhat different in exchange functional Approximation.
The correct way to deploy Hubbard potential is to generate by yourself within the framework of DFPT /linear response( in Quantum espresso, using hp code , you can calculate your U (onsite Hubbard) and V(intersite Hubbard) for your system.
Basically, U and V values are not universal, you can not take from literature. Since those potential depend on many factors like your system, structure, pseudopotential, whether paw or ultrasoft or norm-Conserving psp. And also, the projection you opted for Hubbard projection.
They are the same description as the whole-part relationship. DFT+U remains in the whole relationship, and inside it, there are several functions, such as GGA+U, PBE+U, etc. When you say DFT+U directly, I will assume you are using one of these functions (GGA+U, PBE+U, etc.).