Hi dear Tulu,

I researching about different cell phones brands effects on male reproduction function. Human study is very difficult because we can not control other effective variables but in animal and invitro studies we found that some cell phone brands had more side effects on sperm vitality/ motility as well as count,you can find more detailed findings via reading the papers;

Regards,

Mehran

http://ac.els-cdn.com/S1569905613613226/1-s2.0-S1569905613613226-main.pdf?_tid=70809a8e-99d8-11e5-9277-00000aacb35f&acdnat=1449159238_309517f50a8ea9e808fed085856382a1

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429511025933

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028213000666

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890623811003546

There is no proof that cell phone radiation is harmless.

Substantial evidence has been published which documents harmful biologic effects and health risks from cell phone and other wireless radiation exposure including cancer, infertility, and reproductive health effects. The preponderance of research in the last decade demonstrates harmful effects. For more information about wireless radiation health effects see http://saferEMR.com. For tips on how to reduce your exposure see http://bit.ly/EMRsafetytips,

In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer of the World Health Health Organization sponsored a review of the research by 31 experts and declared radio-frequency radiation "possibly carcinogenic to humans," based primarily on cell phone radiation research.

In 2012, the General Accountability Office issued a report calling on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to review the cell phone radiation standards that were adopted in 1996 and to revise cell phone cell phone testing procedures to resemble who currently uses phones and how they are used.

In 2013, the American Academy of Pediatrics called upon the FCC to adopt cell phone radiation standards and testing procedures that protect children's health and reflect current patterns of use, and provide meaningful consumer disclosure about the potential risks from cell phone radiation

In 2013, the cities of Boston and Philadelphia in an official filing with the FCC criticized federal agencies for a "pass-the-buck" attitude with regard to protecting consumers from cell phone radiation.

In 2014, the California Medical Association issued a resolution calling for "new safety exposure limits for wireless devices to levels that do not cause human or environmental harm based on scientific research.
"

In May 2015, more than 200 scientists from 40 nations who have published peer-reviewed research on electromagnetic fields and biology or health signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal calling on governments to adopt more stringent regulation of wireless radiation (including Wi-Fi) and issue precautionary health warnings (http://EMFscientist.org).

In May 2015, the city council in Berkeley, California unanimously adopted a landmark cell phone "right to know" ordinance. The law requires cell phone vendors to distribute an official notice to customers which informs them that the phone's manufacturer has set a minimum body separation distance to

ensure that the user's cell phone radiation exposure does not exceed the federal limit. The City was sued by the CTIA, the wireless industry lobbyist organization.

In June, 2015, an investigative journalist at Harvard, published an exposé of the FCC, "Captured agency: How the Federal Communications Commission is dominated by the industries it presumably regulates." The chair of the FCC is the former CTIA president, and the current CTIA president is a former FCC commissioner.

In September, 2015, Consumer Reports published an article that explains cell phone radiation risks and recommends that users reduce their exposure. Consumers Union calls on government to strengthen cell phone radiation regulations, for manufacturers to display prominently "steps that cell-phone users can take to reduce exposure to cell-phone radiation," and for cell phone users to adopt safety measures.

For more information about the health effects from exposure to wireless radiation see my Electromagnetic Radiation Safety web site at http://saferemr.com.

Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D.

Director, Center for Family and Community Health

School of Public Health

University of California, Berkeley

Dear Prof. Joel M Moskowetz,

I have gone through your contributions and tips; they are all awesome and I want to say thank you for your contribution. You have listed what users of these technologies should do in order to minimize the risk.  Prof. in this century leaders of the world are running here and there to find solutions for the global problems like environmental protection i.e decreasing carbon monoxide etc. The problem we are discussing today might be uncontrollable tomorrow if we fail to find the ways to control. Yes, users can use the tips you have mentioned but manufacturers need to do more and concerned body should set the policy at the international level in which all cell phone manufacturers should adhere to it. After the standard and policy; if any manufacturer found their product emitting the radiation beyond the standard, the company should be criminal and should be judged accordingly.  Prof what is your idea from your experience?

Thank you once again

Tulu Tilahun

Lecturer at Arba Minch University, AMiT, Department of Computer Science and IT

Ethiopia

I should have pointed you to my wireless radiation tips sheet:

http://bit.ly/saferemrtips3.

Citizens need to pressure all nations to adopt the recommendations of the International EMF Scientist Appeal (http://bit.ly/EMFappeal).

Dear Dr. Joel M Moskowitz,

Thank you so much for your contributions and i will forward your investigations and tips to concerned body to inform my people.

Dear Mehran Hosseini,

How are you? Thank you Mehran for the materials and I appreciate your contributions. The result of your work clearly indicates that frequently usage of cell phone affects the number of sperm which impose infertility.

Dear Mehran, do you think keeping phone nearby men organ, without using but power on, also decrease the sperm count and motility?

Regards,

Hi dear Tulu,

thank you, 

In our study, we use some famous cell phone brands in 5 modes; off, on(no calling or SMS), ON+ 10call per 24 h with 7 minute duration, ON+ 10-15 SMS per 24 h and ON+ call and /sms) and a control group (from each sperm sample without any exposure). In SMS and call group we found the sperm motility significantly decreased. While our preliminary study result shows the frequent cell phone use may be have deleterious effects on sperm motility, but the findings may be false! because, we used ejaculatory sperms (semen) not epididymal sperms. We know that, in INVIVO condition there are several defensive potentials (such as antioxidant activity) to protect sperm damages from environmental factors.

Regards,

Mehran 

Yes! Please take a look at the following RG links and PDF attachments.

Article Mobile phone radiation causes brain tumors and should be cla...

Article Use of Mobile Phones and Cancer Risk

Article Comprehensive Study on Negative Effects of Mobile Phone/ Sma...