yes

From https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/tritium-radiation-fs.html

How does the radiation dose from nuclear power-related tritium compare to the dose a person receives from natural background radioactivity or from medical procedures?

• Tritium is present naturally in the environment and the radiation produced by natural tritium is identical to the radiation produced by tritium from nuclear power plants.
• The tritium dose from nuclear power plants is much lower than the exposures attributable to natural background radiation and medical administrations.
• Humans receive approximately 50 percent of their annual radiation dose from natural background radiation, 48 percent from medical procedures (e.g., x-rays), and 2 percent from consumer products. Doses from tritium and nuclear power plant releases account for less than 0.1 percent of the total background dose (NCRP, 2009). As an example, drinking water for a year from a well with 1,600 picocuries per liter of tritium (comparable to levels identified in a drinking water well after a significant tritiated water spill at a nuclear facility) would lead to a radiation dose (using EPA assumptions) of 0.3 millirem (mrem). That dose is:at least 2,000 to 5,000 times lower than the dose from a medical procedure involving a full-body CT scan (e.g., 500 to 1,500 mrem from a CT scan) 1,000 times lower than the approximate 300 mrem dose from natural background radiation 50 times lower than the dose from natural radioactivity (potassium) in your body (e.g., 15 mrem from potassium) 12 times lower than the dose from a round-trip cross-country airplane flight (e.g., 4 mrem from Washington, D.C., to Los Angeles and back)

Dear Komiljon Radjabovich Rakhmonov ,

Thank you for your response. Could you show me some references?

Dear Michael John Patrick ,

Thank you very much for your detailed explanation. I too scientifically believe that there is no problem with the Japanese government's THO release into pacific ocean. However, some citizens and neighboring countries have expressed their concerns.

Nevertheless, I think it would be useful for monitoring the use of nuclear energy if global infrared measurement of THO is possible with meteorological satellites. For example, if we wanted to obtain the same data for radioactive xenon, we would have to fly a spectator plane over the regions concerned.