Why not? Since we do not know where the all matter and energy is going from the black hole
A Parallel Universe.... yes indeed
As stated above very few people have any understanding of thIS concept or such a subject or can even understand the formular concept
I have a few people i discuss this with NASA and it is a fact that it is very possable within the universe
I am shore we have all seen the rabbit hole doc'o 1-3 on this subject and there are people who would rather it stay within that hole and money is just the start as to why this does not be seen in any publications!!
this is why people are not likely to make any notes on this subject as in the real world too many others can debunk the foundation of there work inthe first place, For further info I will send a link if it can be posted on this site
Our Universe has expanded dramatically. The existence of other galaxies was confirmed only recently, although it was speculated a long time before that by the first atomists. Now the cosmological microwave background is the further we can see with our instruments. But theoretical physics allows us to see further away. But theoretical physics is far from being completed and unified. Different branches of theoretical physics perceives different multiverses. One of the problem with cosmology is the fine tuning of the fundamental constant of physics for the evolution of life. One of the solution for that strange fine tuning has been to assume that there are so many other universes, all with different fundamental constants, so that it is not surprising we end up in the Universe where life exist. I find such reasoning unconvincing. I think that the fine tuning problem arises from having a deterministic model which has to explain everything in terms of initial conditions. The more you have to explain the more fine tuning become your initial conditions. A emergent based cosmic model would avoid the fine tuning problem at the same time of including the evolution of the laws of nature within the model.
Maybe multiverse is a question of scale; maybe They are inside and outside here.
http://www.tecmundo.com.br/15019-Site-mostra-universo-em-escala-de-maneira-impressionante.htm
Eder:
This presentation of the universe at different scales is interesting. We can notice that from one scale to the next there is
a factor of 100 or 1000 from the highest scale at 10^26 to the scale of the neutrino 10^-24 and then there is a huge (10^-11) empty gap down to the hypothetical plank scale of 10^-35. This in itself reveal a big gap in our theory of physics.
Yes, it is possible.
The problem is that our minds could not be prepared to understand them and their implications.
Quantum multiverses must be distinguished by paralell universes like those found by Kashlinsky's team (causing the Dark Flow).
New book: The Allure of the Multiverse , Paul Halpern Basic (2024)
"The term ‘multiverse’ was coined in the 1890s by philosopher and psychologist William James, to describe a cosmos without distinction between right and wrong. Decades later, the word entered physics, owing to the 1950s many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Today, it is a source of controversy, says US physicist Paul Halpern. The multiverse, “with realms beyond direct detection”, seems “antithetical to the goal of testability”. But whether right or wrong, debating it is scientifically productive, Halpern maintains..."
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01277-0
https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/145624758
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Philosophy
- Esthetics
- Interpretation