We know that there are flawed paradigms and golden paradigms. A pollution production market is a flawed paradigm and a pollution-less market is a golden clean market paradigm.
And this raises the question: Is a circular non-renewable energy dominant based economy delinked from social friendliness a golden clean market paradigm?
What do you think? Why?
A clean market is not 100% clean, but it is less harmful. Lucio Muñoz Onipe Adabenege Yahaya
Mohammed, you seem to agree that the answer to the question is No, but you believe that a golden clean market paradigm is not 100% clean.
Can you provide your view of what a golden clean market is and why you think it is not 100 % clean?
I try not to desviate from the actual question, but as you know humanity may learn something from this exchange.
Think carefully and read the question again to provide your view.
Respectfully yours;
Lucio
ONIPE, I GUESS RESEARCHGATE ARASED MY REPLY TO YOU!
it is not there any more!
Onipe, based on your comments you will find the following OLD article with interesting food for thoughts
.
Renewable energy vrs social needs: What do environmentalists must do to induce the development of a sustainable market fueled only by renewable energy?
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281276208_Renewable_energy_vrs_social_needs_What_do_environmentalists_must_do_to_induce_the_development_of_a_sustainable_market_fueled_only_by_renewable_energy
This article was just published, you will find some good food for thoughts in it
Sustainability thoughts 193: Does the current move from the period of green market paradigm shift avoidance 1987-2022 to formal circular economic thinking 2023-2024 make sense in terms of long-term environmental sustainability? If not, why not?
Article Sustainability thoughts 193: Does the current move from the ...
Mohammed, I am sharing here with you Figure 9 of paper by me to be published in the comidng weeks, it shows the structure of the transition from environmentally dirty economies(EDM) to environmentally clean markets(ECLM) using environmental pollution reduction markets(EPORM), you can see two points there at the end of the transition, at point 1 you have a dominant renewable energy based market or partial clean market as some non-renewable energy is still being used.
So at point 1 the clean market, is a partial clean markets as it is not 100% pollution free.
At point 2 you have a fully renewable energy based market, no non-renewable eneregy is used here as NON-REWABLE ENERGY HERE IS A FULL PERFECT SUBSTITUTE OF NON-RENEWABLE ENERGY,,,,from here the clean market produces at the lowest clean market price possible AND 100% clean.
Sharing this figure just for food for thoughts Mohammed,
Respectfully yours;
Lucio
Just sharing newest article by me, you may find some interesting food for thoughts in it about clean market transition friendliness
Sustainability thought 178: Environmental pollution management markets versus environmental pollution reduction markets: Which one is environmentally clean economy transition friendly? Why?
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381698009_Sustainability_thought_178_Environmental_pollution_management_markets_versus_environmental_pollution_reduction_markets_Which_one_is_environmentally_clean_economy_transition_friendly_Why
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Correction